I’m fairly new and don’t 100% understand it yet, but instances are run on servers that require money. Are we heading towards seeing ads or subscriptions to raise funds instead of relying on donations to cover overhead?

Especially with the influx of new users. Hardware upgrades are needed.

  • archomrade [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    That is the worry, yes. There’s very little incentive for them to join the fediverse as a for-profit company otherwise.

    • s4if@lemmy.my.id
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think there are benefit of killing twitter, mocking el*n and skirting europe regulation on moderation laws. But the worry is there, I hope the devs stand their ground and rejecting any doubious modification from meta on fediverse protocols.

      • fiah@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        standing our ground means defederating any and all meta servers as soon as they’re identified

        • Matt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d be surprised if there’s more than one Meta instance, as “multiple instances” tends to make the UX more confusing for those who are unaware of it. So it shouldn’t be hard.

          • fiah@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            they’d abstract that away for their users, they won’t know or care. And if one instance gets blocked, they’ll just spin up a new one and migrate the data. Meta users won’t have to think about the whole fediverse aspect of it because it they had to, it would never get off the ground. So meta has to abstract it away or it’ll be DOA. Which means we have to keep blocking any and all meta instances when they’re identified as such