nuff said

  • RouxFou@dormi.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    With the way he’s running this, I’m a bit confused as to why he didn’t just buy Truth Social directly. Wouldn’t have cost him nearly as much.

        • Arakwar@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Twitter could have 200% more users, if no one want to show them ads, then ad spots will be dirt cheap. Printing 5 millions of 1cent ads vs 1 million of 10cents ads is not the same. Both on income and expenses…

          • 1nk@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            This, so much this. I also find it rather coincidental that fb cam out with threads soon after the twitter implosion. Opportunistic feasting on a dead carcass perhaps?

            • Neato@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Twitter has been on the outs since musk bought it. If Facebook was smart they’d have started right then.

                • eric@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  According to Adam Mosseri, IG had been working on Threads in various forms since 2021. Apparently they struggled to make it a native part of IG, then started working on the stand-alone version in 2022. So if he is to be believed, Threads development predates Twitter’s sale to Musk.

              • dragontamer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                Threads still doesn’t have #hashtag searching IIRC. It’s missing a huge number of features. It’s clear that they only came out as early as they did because they saw an opportunity to eat Twitter’s lunch.

                They really needed a few more months of dev time.

                • garretble@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Bluesky is the same way. There are a lot of features there that still need to be implemented.

                  I’m glad Masto at least has hashtags and video and gifs and editing. For me right now it has the best features and the best experience. I’m pretty happy with it.

                • AnonymousLlama@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Still exciting to be on the ground floor, when every day out week could bring a new update or feature. Wonder how they’ll improve over the next 3 months

              • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Considering development time, server setup, testing time, etc… They probably did. It probably took several months to develop, deploy, integrate with the rest of their systems, and test. And then it’s simply a matter of waiting on Musk to do something stupid before they announce the launch, so all the freshly spurned users are happy to switch.

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Most people I know that use Twitter did leave it because they can no longer use the platform. They used it to promote their work and get new clients, which through a series of changes is basically impossible now.

        • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          That saw an overnight 50% drop in activity. People were kinda pissed to find out that Meta created them a Threads handle from their Facebook/Instagram and immediately deactivated their Threads accounts. I don’t know what it means, but I like it

    • donuts@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Dude could have created his own Mastodon insrance for practically nothing. Is he somehow even dumber than Trump?

    • DingleBoone@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m still convinced there is money coming in from an outside influence that is paying him to destroy Twitter, and I wouldn’t be surprised if the same thing is happening to Reddit as well

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I think he thought the “Twitter files” were real and wanted them so he could be the saviour of democracy and the right wing.

    • Moohamin12@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Let’s be honest Elon doesn’t care about Twitter.

      He bought it with money he doesn’t have. He only increased in net worth since the takeover and has successfully done what he wanted to, destroy an organization he thought was problematic and now everyone gives even more data to Facebook.

      Everyone of them won.

      • JeffCraig@citizensgaming.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think part of it is his own hubris through. His head is so far up his head by now that he though he knew better. It’s the same reason why Super Heavy destroyed itself on first launch. He thought he was smarter than his engineers and forced them to go without a proper launchpad.

    • rustic_tiddles@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      He wanted to prove he doesn’t care about money and is fully willing to throw away $44 billion dollars on a shitpost

  • eoddc5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    Remember the 50% number is just what he was comfortable with publishing to the public

    We have no reason to believe his public statistics

    • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      100% of the ads I see on Twitter today are dropshipping scams, while in the pre-musk era they were highly targeted to my job and interests to the point that if there wasn’t the “ad” tag I couldn’t distinguish that.

      They can’t cost the same for the advertiser, a generic dropshipping scam that targets everyone must be cheap

      • EnbieBies@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Targeted ads are more expensive. They need to develop an algorithm for it and the advertiser gets possible higher turnover since it’s no longer random people.

        • BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          plus, twitter could track the impressions and conversion rates, so they could charge even more for that, too.

    • emptyother@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Why would he tweet about his losses in the first place? I applaud his openness (/s) but I doubt any investors or advertisers will come running to a dying social networking.

      • eoddc5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        If your losses are at 80% and you tell everyone they’re at 50% you can try to spin the story in your favor.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think it’s either better than 50, or he expects it to be better shortly so when he says it’s 40, he can celebrate how good he did for the +10.

  • randomTingler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago
    • Your Google search result redirects to Twitter
    • you click and open the link
    • Twitter asks you to login to see the tweet.
    • You close that tab and move on to next search result.

    Best way to avoid traffic to your site, then complain about revenue loss from advertisements.

  • rusticus1773@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Wait, the white supremacists and Nazis that he caters to aren’t making up the ad revenue? Well I’ll be!

    • RaLiChu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’d imagine the sort of companies willing to advertise towards their ilk are also the types not willing to pay much for it either. Not like typical ad networks like Google’s pay much to begin with lol

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Maybe… I don’t know, just throwing ideas out there… you shouldn’t have Musked all over Twitter nor fired its core developers? Again, just thinking out loud…

    • chickenwing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I agree. I don’t really consider social media “technology” anymore. I mean yeah it uses technology but so does everything else. I don’t think technology is the right community for this kind of post. There should be an enshittification community where we can see all the Twitter, reddit, and meta stuff.

      In fact a lot of “technology” companies are just regular companies with an app. Netflix is a media company, Uber is a taxi company that somehow skirted regulators, and Airbnb is a hotel company that also skirted regulators.

    • randfur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m happy to learn about significant updates to the health of the platform but not as literal Musk tweets pls.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Just shy of the pillow salesman “they did a cancel culture on us” routine.

  • BustedPancake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Of course! It’s because of Threads! Don’t you guys get it? They stole their secrets!! It has absolutely nothing to do with how things are being run on twitter or because Elon Musk is a genius!!!

    Fuck Musk and fuck twitter and all that goes with it.

  • CaptObvious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Let’s see: Alienate the users. Fire everyone who knows how to keep the place running. Fill the site with bots and white supremacists.

    FA complete. FO now underway.

  • Acid@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Colour me surprised that Mr Musk and lowering moderating standards would lower advertising revenue.

  • mavedustaine@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Advertisers don’t want to advertise on Twitter anymore even after Elon fired all the talent and essentially drove the platform into the ground? Noooooo…

  • ShzMeteor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I wonder how the revenue would have look liked if he hadn’t gone out of his way to cater to right-wing nutjobs with all his might. Who knows, maybe he would’ve been able to turn a profit through his numerous schemes like the paid verification and such.