• archomrade [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    They both have shit in them, there’s just more of it or maybe a different consistency to the shit in the other.

    • TeoTwawki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      We may be doing a lot of choosing the lesser evil but gd there is such a huge margin between them right now. I am not willing to give a rapist traitor a 2nd chance to damage the country more than he already did. Hell I expect him to try and pull off something right on election day and if not that a Jan 6th 2.0 right after it. Putting the country into a civil war would not bother the diaper wearing orange shit sandwich in the slightest.

      I will not at all be shocked if republicans under trumps command try to push election certification to the house while complaining of fraud that didn’t happen.

      • archomrade [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        I can already feel libs re-calibrating their ‘electability’ meters to accommodate Harris’s reactionary immigration policies and ‘law and order’ posturing.

        This is a huge step to the right but libs couldn’t give any fewer fucks about it.

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          “Oh, these policies are a step back. Welp, let’s let Mr. Dictator Day One do some more insurrection from the Oval Office, that’ll fix the country.”

          • archomrade [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Who said they wanted cheeto man in the white house? Certainly wasn’t me.

            • LengAwaits@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              “Okay kids, today we’re going to take a vote! Raise your left hand if you want everyone to be kicked in the genitals. Raise your right hand if you’d like everyone to be irreversibly sterilized! You can also choose to abstain from voting by not raising either hand.”

              Two out of the five kids present raise their right hand. One out of the five kids present raises their left hand. Two of the kids abstain.

              As the children are being taken to the sterilization room the kid who raised their left hand turns to the two kids who abstained and asks “Why didn’t you vote!? Now we’re all going to be sterilized!”

              One of the two replies, “Well neither of us wanted to be kicked in the genitals!”

                • LengAwaits@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  No one. I just thought it was a fun story. If you’d like I can add a part where the left-hand-raiser fearmongers to the abstainers about how awful it is to be kicked in the genitals, though.

                  Ranting about the awfulness of the democratic party during a contentious election cycle, on a post about third party options, and with so much on the line for marginalized folx… It just seems like a poor strategy to me. The work is in the streets, not in virtue signaling your leftist moral superiority on Lemmy. For now I’m choosing to feign unity and enthusiasm until such time as I can drop the facade and continue with whatever praxis I can muster.

                  What do I know, though. I definitely don’t have The Answer.

                  • archomrade [he/him]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    seems like a poor strategy to me

                    Not if you’re goal is to push democrats leftward. Funny how leftists are accused of virtue signaling while liberals are quite openly saying they’re biting their tongues and acting excited for a candidate they know is going to put the party back 20 years.

                    Did you know Bad Religion is actually on concert tour right now though? Right now i’ve got this one on heavy rotation.

            • graeghos_714@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              If you don’t vote Dem you’re willing to let him win and don’t see any difference between how the 2 candidates who can actually win differ enough to choose one over the other when one is a fascist

              • archomrade [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’m not saying I won’t vote dem, I’m simply expressing dissent against some of their policies.

                People here act as if observations about a candidate are themselves votes, and if you make enough negative observations about the democrats it will directly cause their loss, but if you balance them with negative statements about the republicans, they will somehow cancel each other out. Worse, people here seem to give more weight to statements or observations about a candidate than the actual candidate themselves, as if nobody saying anything about the democrats doing something bad will prevent it from manifesting into reality.