• norimee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        56
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Lemmy is a quite misogynistic place.

        Its often no fun to be a woman on here. They might rip you apart, if you say something slightly feminist (depending on where you say it). Made me think of leaving several times already.

        • Anne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          41
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Please don’t leave! Keep speaking your mind, if enough of us stick it out we can drown out the users like Captain Asshole here.

        • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I understand if you do, but I hope you won’t. I like this place despite its flaws and I hope it won’t turn into a far right community.

        • Nythos@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Block anyone or any instance you find regularly being outright misogynistic and slowly, but surely, create a better place for yourself.

          • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            The problem is that blocking only solves the smaller issue and basically sweeps Lemmy’s sexism under the rug instead of addressing why sexism is so prevalent in leftist spaces. And I don’t think it’s up to women to educate men on this, it’s up to men to educate other men on this. We have to keep in mind how exhausting it is for women to 1) deal with sexist shit and then 2) basically be told they have to teach men about [traumatic things that they’ve been through and shouldn’t have to re-experience by talking to men]

            • BigAssFan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              Wouldn’t sexism be even more prevalent in right-wing spaces? Or would you say that it’s pretty evenly distributed over the political spectrum?

              • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                3 months ago

                Sexism is prevalent in right-wing spaces as well. I’d say it’s more prevalent and predictable in right wing spaces, but it’s still prevalent and IMO far more disappointing in leftist spaces from people who supposedly claim they’re progressive.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          It fucking sucks. This place was great shortly after the reddit exodus. Now it’s just as bad, if not worse.

          As a man, are there any fucking online spaces that haven’t been co-opted by right wing interests? I’m sick of this “red pill” bullshit infecting the minds of young men in every corner of the internet. Nowhere is safe. I wish they’d crawl back into the holes they came out of.

          We are going fucking backwards and it’s infuriating.

          • norimee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I still have hope.

            On reddit there were also a lot of right wing nuts, incels and raging misogynists, but they tended to concentrate themselves into their own subs and echo chamber bubbles. If you kept yourself away from the “Manosphere” (like r/incels, r/MGTOW, r/MensRights…), the likes of TheDonald and the equaly disturbing misandrists of r/FemaleDatingStrategy it wasn’t that bad.

            I hope this wave of toxic behaviour towards each other is just some kind of growing pain and these toxic people will find themselves seperating into their own communities wigh time.

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s not just misogyny. I’m watching the sweetest, most kind user getting ripped to shreds for posting articles from MSM about candidates across the spectrum, who are of neither major party. The toxicity is wild , self-justification more wild. In the short time I’ve been on Lemmy, it’s “gone to hell in a fast car and keeping it hot,” as I hear a user elsewhere say. about certain topics. I’m quickly becoming of the opinion the up and down votes get discarded and a randomized ranking algorithm put in place.

      • DragonTypeWyvern
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Lemmy is filled with the most opinionated kind of Redditors and Russians it can fit on the servers, it’s a moderator miracle it didn’t go full incel.

      • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Hopefully it was from the perspective that the comment is not helpful in reducing the number of murders of women.

        I don’t know, I don’t personally see the harm in merely motivational comments or rants. But I thought it might be that.

        • acargitz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I honestly have no idea how any Lemmy comment might be helpful at reducing the murders of women.

          • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Maybe if they proposed some policy, or shared some stats and facts, instead of merely a statement of hope.

        • acargitz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Wtf are you talking about. What a weird thing to write. I’m very much not OK with being murdered thank you very much.

          • Jax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            Listen, cut him some slack - it’s really hard to keep your hands dry when you’re writing inside of a bubble. They’re very soapy, and you can’t move too much or they’ll pop.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    “The authorities in north-west Kenya, where Cheptegei lived and trained, said she was targeted after returning home from church with her two daughters.”

    it then has something about land and quarelling but its hard to get what happened.

    “A report filed by a local administrator alleged the athlete and her ex-partner had been wrangling over a piece of land. Police say an investigation is under way. Cheptegei, from a region just across the border in Uganda, is said to have bought a plot in Trans Nzoia county and built a house to be near Kenya’s elite athletics training centres.”

    it talks of her generosity and position as a bread winner. I wonder if he wanted her to buy it at some inflated price or some crap. I guess ultimately it does not matter what the stupidity was but for some reason im always trying to figure out the thinking from the nutter in the story. Luckily it does not mention injuries to the daughter although apparently he got himself somewhat but not enough to die.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Just terrible.

    If there were some kind of global women’s vigilante network to handle these things, I would definitely not snitch.

    • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      101
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      men*

      Edit: lotta downvotes from men claiming to be leftists but bury their head in the sand when it’s ever mentioned that violence, especially murder against women, is mostly committed by men. If your solidarity abruptly halts at issues like this and you call yourself a leftists, you’re only kidding yourself and other sexist men.

      Thanks for confirming beyond a doubt that Lemmy is just another “leftist” spaced filled with sexist men. Gross and so disappointing.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Most of the replies you’ve received are trying to explain that saying “men” are what is wrong with “people” is a generalisation that is unhelpful and harms all men.

        It’s true that the perp is a man, and it’s also true that most violence against women is perpetrated by men. However, that doesn’t mean there’s a causal link between being a man and assaulting women.

        It’s much more likely that the addressable causes underlying this “man’s” actions are poverty, lack of mental health support, and cultural norms including but not limited to religion.

        When you suggest that “men” are the cause of what happened to this athlete, it’s not surprising that men will be offended. To thereafter frame the obvious response as sexist is projection, frankly.

        • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          The article mentions a land dispute. Kenya has a murder for land problem.

          It takes many forms, including witch hunting - the spread of witch hunting in sub Saharan Africa mostly an excuse for land grabs against the weak. Old man, single women, get targeted by gangs under the guise of witch hunting. It is also fueled by Christian churches vying for power against traditional religion in the region.

          Sorry, went off track a bit. But even though it was her ex who did it, it is very likely a land dispute rather than misogyny behind the horrid crime.

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          3 months ago

          Men literally prey after women. When its done right its called, what, lust? Love?

          A lot of men are drawn to women as their natural state.

          Its not a crazy thing to say that women should be cautious around men in general is it?

          • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Disingenuous at best.

            People need to be cautious around people.

            The vast majority of men do not “prey” on anything, including women.

            • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I’m sorry I just don’t feel very unsafe around women. Why should I? The cast majority of violence is committed by men against other men.

              I’m a man, and I’m wary of other men, who often attack men over women, or their ego, or their fragile state of mind has been disrupted momentarily or whatever other trivial reason men feel justified attacking people.

              Driving in my car = men are more likely to participate in road rage At work = men are more likely to commit violence at work than women At home = men are most likely to break and enter occupied homes In public = men are most likely to be the perpetrator of a public mass shooting public shooting.

              I’m a man and I agree with women. Men often react violently when angry, and women simply do not. Whether thats a power thing, and if women were bigger it would flip, but the point is, if you are generally worried about your safety, then you don’t need to worry about women very much at all, and you need to worry about men very much so.

              Remember these are generalizations, anyone is capable of anything and women have killed men before and women have committed violence before.

              • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                Everything you’ve listed is an absurd over statement.

                often attack men over women, or their ego, or their fragile state of mind has been disrupted momentarily or whatever other trivial reason men feel justified attacking people.

                This is simply not the reality I live in. I’ve never known someone to attack someone over a woman, nor their fragile state of mind?

                Driving in my car = men are more likely to participate in road rage At work = men are more likely to commit violence at work than women At home = men are most likely to break and enter occupied homes In public = men are most likely to be the perpetrator of a public mass shooting public shooting.

                I’ve certainly never experienced any of this and while mass shootings and robberies do occur they’re so rare that being a victim of such a crime is not a tangible risk.

                Honestly you’re more likely tripping over your shoelace and dying than any of these things actually happening.

                • barsoap@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Honestly you’re more likely tripping over your shoelace

                  Ladders. Ladders are the #1 killer. And stupid shit on top of that, like taking something down from a high shelf.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              This is so fucking ignorant, it’s like you’ve never actually spoken to a woman before in your life (and no, the nice lady that delivers your chicken tenders doesn’t count).

              When men leave the house, the worst thing we walk around in fear of is ridicule and rejection. Women (rationally) fear for their personal safety. All of the time. You and I cannot even grasp what that must do to a person mentally.

              If you even suggest that this isn’t the case, go fuck yourself. I have nothing more to say to you. Some idiotic bullshit doesn’t need more of a platform on the internet than it already has, destroying the minds of young men.

              • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Sure mate.

                It’s patently absurd to suggest that all women fear for their personal safety “all of the time” when they leave the house.

                Sure, there’s a very few places in the world where that may be true, but it certainly is not generally true.

                I think your comment says more about you than it does about me.

              • sudneo@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                3 months ago

                When men leave the house, the worst thing we walk around in fear of is ridicule and rejection.

                Do you live in a cartoon? Seriously, this is complete nonsense. I worry about my personal safety very often, when an environment presents certain risks (e.g., getting robbed, mugged etc.). It’s true that I don’t generally fear to be sexually assaulted by a woman, but to say that men don’t (need to) worry about their personal safety is completely absurd.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            When the dynamic you’re alluding to is done right you have the (typically, not always) woman wanting to be chased as much as the man is chasing. It’s the rider saying “oooh, rollercoaster, you’re so intimidating and scary, toss me around” while the rollercoaster is saying “ooooh, you like to be intimidated do you I’ll hold you fast and secure”.

      • SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s insane you’re getting this downvoted. Domestic violence from men against women is a massive global issue, and putting your hands over your ears and saying “ well I’m not the problem” is not doing anything. This problem will never get solved until men take ownership over it and stop it.

        • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          What does this even mean? What fraction of men do you presume are abusers for one, and for two, are you assuming every man knows every other man and we just bulk regulate?

          This is some “all black people know each other” kind of stupid.

        • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Domestic violence is a global issue. But you’re not helping anyone by further pushing a stereotype and ignoring the problem. Do you think only cis men are capable of domestic violence? Because such a though would be bigoted in a few different ways to be honest.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Are we talking about what’s possible or what is likely?

            Here I’ll answer both:

            1. Yes anyone is capable of violence
            2. 95% of all murder is by men, so is much more likely.

            Bonus: men are far more likely to be a victim of violence than a woman. Men also should be cautious around strange new men!

            • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              That stat is entirely reductive and meaningless. And two of your answers are sexist. Not that I think you give a shit.

              • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                That stat is entirely reductive and meaningless.

                How? How is a statistic like this meaningless?

                If the statistic were reversed, you’re going to tell me that you wouldn’t care? If 95% of murders were committed by women? You don’t need to answer, I already know.

                The reality, though, is if that were ever the case, men would immediately put a stop to it, and it would be no time before women were relegated to baby-making machines with no agency like freaks like Vance want.

                • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  If the statistic were reversed, you’re going to tell me that you wouldn’t care?

                  I’d be calling bullshit still. Sensationalized “stats” for the sake of views on “news”/blogs/podcasts is nothing new and I will not subscribe to it. I’m not sure which fallacies are in play here but I suspect it’s several.

                  If 95% of murders were committed by women? You don’t need to answer, I already know.

                  You really don’t.

                  This is a thread about Rebecca Cheptegei and you bring Vance into this… something 100% unrelated and is frankly, disrespected to the deceased. The problem is, you spend way to much time on the internet/news cycle and now you have a screwed up view of reality. You need to largely disconnect from the internet for a significant period of time

        • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          The vast majority of the time a woman is murdered, it’s at the hands of a man. Yes.

          "Although women comprise more than half the U.S. population, they committed only 14.7% of the homicides noted during the study interval. More than twice as many women were shot and killed by their husband or intimate acquaintance than were murdered by strangers using guns, knives, or any other means."

          I’m going to bed but there’s countless other studies that show the same trend not just in the USA but in countries across the world. This paper was published in '92 and for those who doubt its legitimacy based on its age, I recommend looking up modern papers on this.

          Edit: One last thing before I go to sleep. I’m not making these comments because I want to make men feel bad, or that I think the average guy on Lemmy reading this is a murderer or potential murdered. I’m saying this because as men, we need to cut the bullshit and stop acting like we don’t hear other men casually talk about domestic violence, either “jokingly” or dead serious, or that we don’t see other men engaging in verbal or physical abuse against women. As a POC, I feel pretty much the same way about racism-- I don’t think the average white person is some KKK member but please for the love of god white folks, if you hear someone (especially your friends/family) saying/doing some racist shit, call it out!

          Lotta downvotes but no responses to the study I provided. Not at all surprised. Until men are willing to simply acknowledge the existence of this problem, we’ve got a long way to go. Leftists on Lemmy definitely showing their true colors and it’s not surprising, so many leftist spaces get ruined by sexist men who want a safe space where they can discuss racism, transphobia, homophobia but sexism… Nope.

          • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Dude, I 100% get what your saying.

            Unfortunately what your asking of people requires personal sacrifice, and people will mentally go all over the place to resist that.

            A personal anecdotes is that I’m no longer in contact with my family because I refused to see my racist grandfather on his deathbed and didn’t attend his funeral.

            My grandfather was an abusive, literal stereotype of a racist(would say things like “them n-words down the road are fucking up this town”) and a raging alcoholic. The world is better because he’s fucking dead. Now I don’t have a family of origin because I wouldn’t pretend he was a good person.

            Men will lose friends and family if they start calling this shit out. It’s hard. You get told to “mind your business” or "it’s just a joke " or get your masculinity questioned. Or the whole “but they’re family” thing. I get why people resist it. No one wants to lose their social support, but often that’s what it comes down to, and they’ll make it feel like you’re the one who’s in the wrong the whole time.

            Social pressure is a hell of a thing. I think framing the context around why men don’t call this stuff out will help them recognize why they should.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh boohoo did those mean men downvote you? Just another reason to mandate isolation of genders.

      • MellowYellow13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh stfu. And we could bring up a million other things that are committed mostly by women and you wouldn’t say a fucking thing.

        • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          This is a discussion about a woman who was murdered, so why on earth would you bring up irrelevant stats? There’s a reason why you’re deflecting. Your only contribution to this discussion is a comment telling me to "stfu" because you’d rather deflect than confront sexism. The older I get, the less surprised I am to see not so low-key sexism in leftist spaces. You could have made any kind of comment in this thread and all you decided on was "bUt wHat aBoUT [irrelevant subject]".

          It’s so disappointing, frustrating and downright exhausting. I fully expect this kind of rhetoric from conservatives and liberals but it just sucks to hear it in leftist spaces by people who claim to be allies to marginalized people. I honestly think I’m just going to take a break from online spaces like Lemmy and stick to my one community that just happens to be created/lead by a woman. Shit like this is why so many leftist websites and local clubs just turn into a hangout for mostly white guys cluelessly wondering why there’s so little diversity. ✌🏾

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    RIP. This is just such a sad story. I hoped things went better. I hoped she would recover. I guess the guy mentioning the 75% burn was not survivable was right this time.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Okay JFC who sets someone on fire over a land dispute!? I mean I’d be all for lighting, say, Kim Jong Un on fire, but that guy’s a mad murdering sociopath. I dunno what penalties there are for egregiously horrible murder, but that guy deserves it.

    Are there special punishments or charges for deluxe murder? Like murder with extra suffering? IDK humanity is pretty fucked up.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      When my family murdered folks over land disputes the other folks did it first, we also used guns and a ditch. Seriously burning someone alive is something ya leave to trench fighters.

    • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Whoa… Bad choice of words…

      Or great, depends on what you were going for…

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Agreed. Star would have implied because of her athletic skill, I meant because of her spirit.

    • UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      How about we instead keep on teaching men healthy masculinity and create the foundations for a better society rather than keep “banning” everything bad.

      An all women/men world would still have evil perpetrators.

        • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          I terrify my wife. When she comes home I hide next to the fridge and I say “BOO!” and I get her just about every time. Then I hug my kids and finish making dinner.

          Your pity party here is a self-fulfilling prophecy and screams white knight and all that. You can do better, get out of your head.

        • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          News only reports like this and it skews peoples perceptions. For example, I’m a guy. This last weekend I took my friend and all her kids (all girls) out for amusement park, festival, swimming, gifts, and any food they wanted out weekend before school starts. I paid for everything. You won’t find it in the news, Why’d I do it, because they moved to a new city far away from their friends so I wanted to start all the girls on a very happy note for school starting.

          No one owes you examples. Men are not inherently evil and women are not inherently good. People, all people, have the capacity for both good and evil.

    • ealoe@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      3 months ago

      “us” speak for yourself buddy but I have never lit a woman on fire and never will. We all would be better off without violent assholes regardless of their gender.

    • wildcardology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, the bear argument applies here. The bear would just kill you. Man would make you suffer.