• sci@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    im pretty sure the engineering is not at fault for most car accidents.

      • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ll never forget the last thing grandpa ever said to me:

        “Stop shaking the ladder, you little shit!”

      • Coreidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What about the chemical engineers creating fuels that turn out environments into toxic hellholds? Where does all of the pollution in the world come from?

    • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      We could use engineering controls to limit the speed of consumer vehicles to 10 mph, still faster than a human can walk, but slow enough that most deadly accidents could be avoided.

      Then establish administrative controls to have public transportation or other professional drivers (taxi operators) have “unlocked” vehicles. They would be required to have routine training and testing to keep their unlocked license.

      • sci@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        #1 Distracted Driving. …

        #2 Drunk and Drugged Driving. …

        #3 Poor Weather. …

        #4 Reckless Driving and Road Rage. …

        #5 Speeding. …

        limiting speed would not affect the leading 4 causes of car accidents

        • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It would affect fatal injury car accidents. A driver would have to be holding a knife pointed at their jugular to be killed in a 10 mph wreck (20 mph total relative speed of get hit another 10 mph limited car).