• JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 小时前

      Great. First science was making the frogs gay. Now it’s turning the mosquitos trans.

      What’s next? Lesbian amoebas? Pansexual algae? Non-binary seahorses?

      Has science gone too far?

  • bad_alloc@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 小时前

    We have suffered for millions of years under mosquitos are they are likely the biggest killer of humans in history. Maybe us evolving big brains and developing genetic engineering is an evolutionary necessity?

    Or as Harbinger said: “We impose order on the chaos of organic evolution. You exist because we allow it, and you will end because we demand it.”

  • nednobbins@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 小时前

    I get the feeling of discomfort but it’s basically the same feeling we get when someone breaks a pencil

    There is no evidence that a mosquito is capable of feeling the kind of despair or horror that a human would feel in a similar situation. It’s unlikely that mosquitos can form emotions at all.

    At the same time, a huge portion of human-animal interactions involve the human controlling the animal in ways that they animal can’t even comprehend. A dog has no idea you’re doing operant conditioning to change their behavior. Pigs have no idea they’re being fed just so they and their children can be eaten.

    The only way to avoid this kind of thing is to turn off your big human brain and go back to ape tier. We might need to go farther down the tier list than that though https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gombe_Chimpanzee_War

  • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 小时前

    I’d like to see any scientific study that reassures at least a little that this won’t have terrible ramifications for ecosystems and the food chain.

    We know too little, we are shortsighted and we have a bad record of intervening with nature.

  • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 小时前

    I get the caution about unintended consequences but damnit of all the crazy planetary issues we’re dealing with right now, I’d rank

    “oops, got rid of West Nile and Malaria as well as annoying little red bumps from wandering too far from big cities”

    As a win, the consequences of which we can probably figure out how to deal with when we come to it.

    I know it doesn’t work that way but I’d trade all the world’s mosquitoes to keep the polar bears or pangolins or something any day.

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 小时前

      Mosquitoes are the bottom of the food chain. There’s reason to be worried about this getting out of hand

  • CptEnder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 小时前

    Ok but mosquitoes historically are the #1 killers of humans, by an order of magnitude. This could be argued as a form of evolution. We simply engineered them out as a threat. GG get gud scrub, see you in 3 million years when you have your own AI generated bioengineering.

    • exasperation@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 小时前

      Ok but mosquitoes historically are the #1 killers of humans, by an order of magnitude

      Homo sapien: am I a joke to you?

      • nyctre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 小时前

        According to google, yeah. Mosquito-borne diseases are responsible for 52 billion deaths. I was extremely surprised myself.

        • exasperation@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 小时前

          Probably. But it’s also a bit of a difficult question to compare the two.

          One prominent estimate is that about half of all humans who have ever lived died from mosquito-related illness, about 50 billion of the 100 billion humans who have ever lived.

          For humans, it’s estimated that about 3-4% of paleolithic humans died from violence at the hands of another person, and that number may have risen to about 12% during medieval history, before plummetting in the modern age.

          But that’s the comparison of direct violence versus illness. Humans have a strong capacity to indirectly cause death, including by starvation, illness, indirect trauma. How do we count deaths from being intentionally starved as part of a siege? Or biological weapons, including the time the Nazis intentionally flooded Italian marshes to increase malaria? Do we double count those as both human and mosquito deaths?

          And then there’s unintentional deaths, caused by indifference or recklessness or negligence. Humans have caused famines, floods, fires, etc.

          So yeah, mosquitoes probably win. But don’t sleep on humans. And remember that the count is still going on, and humans can theoretically take the lead in the future.

    • loutr@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      16 小时前

      Hey, most bugs are cool and an important part of their ecosystem.

      Mosquitoes tho ? Yeah, fuck them.

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        14 小时前

        as much as i’d love to agree with that-

        mosquitos are pollinators and an important food source for quite a few animals. Our eco system would not be fine if we got rid of them

          • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 小时前

            Bees are pollinators because they go to flowers and collect and move pollen.

            Mosquitoes don’t have time to hang out in flowers because they’re busy screaming in your ear at 2 AM.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          12 小时前

          The largest type of mosquito in the Americas is an invasive species. There would be no harm done wiping them out.

        • weker01@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 小时前

          That… That is a price I am willing to accept.

          Total mutual destruction is the only way™

      • yrmp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 小时前

        Not a biologist, but it actually is better on paper. They can still pierce other animals. Just not humans. They stay part of the food chain for amphibians and birds or what not, we don’t get malaria. Seems like a win-win.

  • bluewing@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 小时前

    It’s a nice idea. But I wonder what the long term ramifications might be. What ripple effects might happen that we can’t see today that end up being problems in the future.

    Human history is littered with such problems.

      • Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 小时前

        While some species may benefit from the absence of mosquitoes, others could face ecological disruptions due to changes in food webs.

        However, eliminating mosquitoes entirely could also have unforeseen consequences, highlighting the importance of careful consideration and scientific research.

        Other people have asked the same question you have, Niko, and scientists think that removing every single mosquito from the world wouldn’t have a bad overall effect on the environment. But none of us are sure what will happen to small ecosystems and whether these would be better off without mosquitoes.

        The science is not really settled yet.

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 小时前

        Yes I know. And maybe those studies are fully correct. I certainly have no way to cross check them. So you and I must take them at face value.

        But even science will tell you that you should have at least some skepticism of such studies. Because it always seems like we miss some tiny important detail that only reveals it’s self later as we refine our knowledge on a subject.

        • sazey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 小时前

          I am all for eradicating the mosquito pest but there is no way a study is going to cover all possible impacts of removing them from existence. Anyone claiming to do so is just drunk on hubris.

          • meliaesc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 小时前

            The amount of ecologically horrifying acts that our species has already done, I’d be willing to add “got rid of mosquitos” to the pile.