• solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    everyone who STILL has a fucking twitter account is contributing to this bullshit

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Wait… Elon is a complete piece of shit and is doing piece of shit things?!?

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Ironically, right-wing Arnold who was a deep-dark republican back in the ancient times stumping for Bush and capturing the Governorship as a right-wing guy is way more reasonable and human than Elmo who’s never held any political position at all.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I am honestly impressed that you got that little joke I threw in there. I was just amusing myself with that bit of Irony. Originally, I was gonna go with the Fawlty Towers version.

        EDIT: Don’t forget how Arnie was banging and impregnating his house maid. He’s been a dick himself.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    John Adams had tracks printed that warned the colonists about the evil British plot to enslave white men.

    Violence, fraud, and intimidation around voting was such a threat in early America, some think that it may be responsible for killing Edgar Allen Poe.

    Pulitzer and Hersh used their newspapers to push the country into war with Spain, over another conspiracy theory.

    This is not new, it’s not even remarkable for it’s stupidity.

    To those who say MAGA I ask: when were we great? To those who defend Democracy I ask: when were we a Democracy? (don’t worry, I’m going to vote for the cop over the fascist, I’m just saying).

      • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Why is a flawed democracy preferable to other systems? Why are we convinced that democracy is the only way to run a society? It’s not like the only other possible options are autocratic dictatorships, we just refuse to entertain the thought that maybe letting idiots decide how to run a country maybe isn’t optimal

  • Jagothaciv@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    Hackers should just destroy X. We would all be appreciative. It would kill multiple birds with one stone.

  • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Maybe giving conservatives internet access has been a mistake.

    Maybe the internet in general has been a mistake.

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Nah, the internet has been great. It’s the anonymity that’s the problem. Everyone should just have one account. You could still post anonymously, but you can’t get any clout for it. If you want to have clout, you have to have a name and it has to be your actual one.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s the anonymity that’s the problem. Everyone should just have one account. You could still post anonymously, but you can’t get any clout for it.

      • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Some of the worst shitbags in the world are online proudly under their own names.

        Anonymity isn’t the problem. Instant mass communication between creatures with plains ape brains is the problem. We are not cognitively equipped for this shit.

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          You make good points.

          Requiring people to use their real name would take out a lot of the noise, the false and misleading info, and the unqualified opinions that people are blasting out into the ether, and then other people who don’t know any better find it and feel with their ape brains that their own malformed opinions and emotions are validated.

          I don’t think this country used to be as insane as it is now. And I attribute the insanity to bad faith actors amplifying bad faith messaging on social media.

          As to your last point, we are definitely not cognitively equipped for what we have. Can we equip ourselves now, after the fact?

          • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Requiring people to use their real name would take out a lot of the noise, the false and misleading info, and the unqualified opinions that people are blasting out into the ether, and then other people who don’t know any better find it and feel with their ape brains that their own malformed opinions and emotions are validated.

            But requiring all internet users to identify (somehow, let’s leave the implementation aside for now) would also mean that anyone living in a repressive regime would be even more fucked than they are now, and it’d mean that even people living in at least nominally democratic countries but with a nonzero amount of violent conservatives would be an easier target, since there’d be no pseudonymity.

            As to your last point, we are definitely not cognitively equipped for what we have. Can we equip ourselves now, after the fact?

            Frankly I doubt it. The cat is out of the bag, and I really don’t know how we can unfuck this situation – at least without significant amounts of social upheaval and bloodshed in the interim

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 days ago
    International Fact-Checking Network - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for International Fact-Checking Network:

    Wiki: reliable - The Poynter Institute’s International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) reviews fact-checking organizations according to a code of principles. There is consensus that it is generally reliable for determining the reliability of fact-checking organizations.


    MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2024/elon-musk-uses-x-account-spread-misinformation/

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support