Tech tycoon Elon Musk joined a call between US President-elect Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky the day after the presidential election, according to a source with knowledge of the situation.

  • Fester@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    144
    ·
    1 month ago

    Remember when they used to try to keep corruption somewhat hidden and deniable? Now the richest man in the world is just going to be walking around the White House, tugging the government’s leash on full display.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      93
      ·
      1 month ago

      He’s going to be on the cabinet while getting billions in government contracts. The richest man in the world just got a job where he gets to to shovel more government money to himself. And that’s what Trump calls ‘draining the swamp’ and ‘sticking it to the elites’.

      And somehow, instead of democrats calling that out, they decided to find their own elites to trot out.

      • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It wasn’t enabled in Crimea in the first place. The author misspoke/lied about in the book and has later admitted it.

        U.S. sanctions to Russia forbid the use of Starlink. This includes crimea and the occupied territories. That’s why it wasn’t enabled.

        To clarify on the Starlink issue: the Ukrainians THOUGHT coverage was enabled all the way to Crimea, but it was not. They asked Musk to enable it for their drone sub attack on the Russian fleet. Musk did not enable it, because he thought, probably correctly, that would cause a major war.

        And before someone points out the ‘cause major war’ things, those are Walters words, not Elon’s. Musk said “It would make SpaceX explicitly complicit in a marjor act of war and conflict escalation” He later also added that had he been contacted by the US officials and asked to enable it he would, but they didn’t.

          • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            The front lines are not static so you can only imagine the difficulty SpaceX has trying to determine which terminal is in Ukranian use and which ones are Russian. For all we know, they may have disabled hundreds if not thousands of terminals they’ve found out to be used by the Russians and are getting no credit for it. I don’t buy into this narrative that Elon is personally invested into Russia winning. I’ve seen no evidence for it but plenty against it which everyone just seems to conveniently ignore because Musk bad.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nah, he’ll use the location services from the dish to pinpoint the Ukrainian troop locations. If they’re smart they’ll start smashing them immediately.

  • hyperreal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Musk’s whole “slash government spending” schtick is such a farce. Tesla wouldn’t have domestic manufacturing facilities without a DOE loan. SpaceX survives off of government contracts.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Maybe Germany France Italy Spain Sweden Finland Poland … and the UK could step up?

      I mean let me dream a little.

      • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Germany, LMAO. Didn’t they have their lips around putin’s pipe that got blown up?

        I bet the “russia is a trade partner” shtick will come back real soon.

    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think a lot of Americans don’t understand that the USA hedgemony isn’t a divine right, it was a deliberate construction with tacit agreement of convenience from the western world.

      Much like an economy, belief makes it so.

      Much like the UK’s arrogance has driven them into geopolitical obscurity, so will the USA’s.

      In 15 years, Americans are going to wake up and realize that their voices are irrelevant in the world. I don’t know how y’all are going to handle it.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The USA became dominant by letting the world fight itself to ruins, then entering into the war late and declaring victory. TWICE.

        Being the only mostly undestroyed nation after a world war is immensely profitable.

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        I deeply, desperately hope you’re right. In the best case, the military (including the nuclear arsenal) gets as hollowed out as russias before that realization comes.

      • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m going to be bummed, but it’ll be deserved. Maybe future generations will stop being entitled assholes. Idk. Don’t want to live in a disintegrating country. Really don’t want my kids to. But I guess we don’t always get to pick.

        • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          Maybe future generations will stop being entitled assholes.

          Look what’s happening with Gen Z right now. They showed a lot of promise, then showed up to vote and turns out they have just as many nazis as the rest of us. We’re going ride this death spiral all the way to extinction.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    A scammer gets reeled into a phone call between a president and a mobster wannabe.

    Great timeline

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      The companies might do better if he’s there less to make decisions for them.

    • 1024_Kibibytes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 month ago

      Musk doesn’t need to run for office. He’s the richest man in the world. With Trump as president, Musk can just call him, offer a few million and get whatever he wants.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Musk has enough money to change whatever rules he wants and tie up all the government lawyers for years fighting over all the rules he might want to break.

        Billionaires shouldn’t exist.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 month ago

        Until trump, supermajority in Congress, and a hand picked supreme court say so

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yep. Look up the standards of a constitutional amendment. (Spoiler alert: having a supermajority is a good start)

            • Pennomi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 month ago

              Constitutional amendments also have to be ratified by the states. That’s not trivial.

              • andrewta@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                While it is a big standard that it has to be ratified by the states. What a lot of people don’t realize is the citizens do not get to vote on a constitutional amendment for the United States. It’s the legislators. The citizens get absolutely zero say. Didn’t know this until just a couple of months ago I actually thought it was the people who voted on it. Now let’s look at the political map of the United States. Do the Republicans hold more legislative houses in the states or did the Democrats? And how big of a percentage split does a given state have to have?

                What I mean is, for example North Dakota, that legislative house, the Senate and the House of Representatives, how many senators have to vote in favor of to get it to pass for North Dakota? How many representatives have to favor in favor for pass for North Dakota?

                Is there enough Republicans in that state in both the house and the Senate that would vote in favor this?

                Now look at each state look at the difference in between Democrats and Republicans in each state.

                I don’t know if we’re at the point yet where they could get The needed majority, I literally have not counted the Republicans in each state… But it would be an interesting question.

                • Pennomi@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Yeah, you need 38 states to ratify it. If we go by governors (so I don’t have to do a ton of research, but it’s probably representative of legislatures), only 27 states are Republican controlled. Good fucking luck getting a partisan amendment through.

          • b000rg
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            The Constitution can be changed; it has been 27 times already, so I don’t see why everyone seems to think it’s set in stone.

          • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I think you’re right. It would hinge on the natural-born-citizen clause and that’s probably hard to “reinterpret” even for a loaded court.

          • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            the constitution

            …yeah that’s a couple months away from being slathered in Trump’s feces and filed securely into one of the whitehouse’s toilets.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    nice, a five year old participating in diplomacy regarding nation destroying wars. what could go wrong.