From the Article:

For weeks following Joe Biden’s disastrous performance, his campaign publicly maintained the illusion that he was still well-positioned to defeat Donald Trump. Privately, they knew otherwise. As Pod Save America co-host Jon Favreau revealed days after the election:

After the debate, the Biden people told us that the polls were fine, and Biden was still the strongest candidate. They were privately telling reporters, at the time, that Kamala Harris couldn’t win. […] Then we find out, when the Biden campaign becomes the Harris campaign, that the Biden campaign’s own internal polling, at the time when they were telling us he was the strongest candidate, showed that Donald Trump was going to win 400 electoral votes.

The implications of this are staggering, and it should be treated as a massive scandal.

  • frezik
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not sure what you mean about pollsters. They said it would be a tight race, and it was. Trump did not have a landslide by any means.

    • Sergio@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Agreed. Trump won by 140k in PA, 80k in MI, 30k in WI. That’s less than 0.16% of the total vote. (source)

    • DragonTypeWyvern
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah people really seem to have a hard time understanding this. Like they think 51% is some huge plurality.

      • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think a lot of people, including me just shut out all the crap after the election - So I don’t think it’s that people have a difficult time understanding it I think people just didn’t continue to follow the news and the see the final numbers a week or so later.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s the thinking with the elctoral college. Since most states are winner-take-all, a narrow victory can make an electoral landslide.

      In 1984, Reagan won 58% of the popular vote - which is impressive, but nowhere near unanimous.

      But due to how the system works, he won 98 percent of the electoral vote. Mundane only won in Minnesota and DC.

      It was super close in Minnesota (only about 4000 votes).

      DC was a crazy landslide, though. They HATED Reagan, who only took 13% of the vote in DC.

    • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      you’re right. I have to admit after the election I shut out lots of political media and really missed that it was closer than I thought.