• chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Pedantic rant, but I hate people saying they “believe” in science. Science is not a matter of belief. It’s the realm of the empirical.

    Leave belief to religion and knowledge to science. Mixing the two turns out bad every time.

    • galanthus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I quite like that expression. It seems accurate to me, since, as it was pointed out by another commenter replying to you, people do not, in fact, check the experiments themselves, ensure that proper methodology was used, etc. They simply believe what the people in authority positions are telling them, so the word believe is quite accurate - you do not actually know the reasons why certain beliefs, theories are accepted by the scientific community, you just take their word for it.

      Furthermore, any scientist does the same thing to the body research that was developed before him, otherwise, every scientist would have to start over.

    • nialv7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      But you do have to believe though. If you are just a brain in a jar, then all your empirical evidences are just illusions. At the very least you have to have faith that that’s not the case.

    • pancakes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I think people are more talking about believing in scientific institutions to ensure credibility and good faith research. Not necessarily that an individual institution is credible, but more the scientific community as a whole can be relied on.

      Science is absolute, however the way we interpret and understand it isn’t flawless and at the end of the day some level of belief has to be put into the fallible people behind it.

      • galanthus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        If science, as it is practised is flawed, by your own admission, what do you mean when you say that it is absolute?

        • pancakes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The scientific laws that govern how everything functions from subatomic particles, to beehive structure, to gravity are absolute and unchanging. Our understanding of them is flawed and changes over time, but the laws themselves can’t be changed.

          • galanthus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            As far as I understand, science is a human endeavour, so I would certainly not say it is absolute, but I see what you mean.

            Although I would say, my position is somewhat different, I do not see any reason to believe that even if these “laws” exist, science has at any level access to them, the “nature of reality”, if you will, “laws of the universe” are metaphysical concepts that can only ever be speculative, scientific laws are not interpretations of them, they are separate constructions.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 hours ago

    After waking up? I’ve never heard this. My brain turns right back off if I don’t put a screen in front of my face. Have I been doing this wrong all this time???

    • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I wake up to electronic birds coming out of my magic rectangle, i gaze upon it as the tiny sun fills my shell with life for yet another day.

  • BigPotato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I believe in science. I believe that the study show that (because I haven’t read them). I believe that I will continue using my phone because even with good efforts my body is still killing itself happily.

    So, fuck you body. Dopamine rectangle goes brrrrrr.

      • lukewarm_ozone@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Hmm, interesting. Somewhat compelling, but:

        • it’s a rather small (n=38) Chinese pilot study
        • the effect on the sleep latency is sizable (a latency decrease from 31±14 to 18±12 minutes, effect size of 0.85), but there’s no effect on actual sleep duration.
        • the sleep measurements were subjective (sleep diaries, not actigraphy)

        I’m also a bit concerned why it’s the only study with this methodology in this later meta-analysis - all of the other “behavioral intervention” studies in it experiment with stuff like “extended time-in-bed”. In other words, there seems to not have been any followup or replication of this study.

        • Hackworth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          We must stop this science on science violence.

          -> You mean peer review?

          Lol, don’t the publications farm that out and review none of it?

          -> We must stop this science on science violence!

          I think that’s just the corrupting influence of money and power.

          -> We use good methodology to show methodology has been systemically compromised.

          [citation needed]

          This one-scene play brought to you by: God, is it only Wednesday?!

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Me, who uses my phone before and after bed, with no issues getting or staying asleep: lol

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Curious if you use dark mode, reduced brightness, or the feature that shifts away from blue light at night. I use all those and I think that’s why my phone use doesn’t seem to affect my sleep. In fact, I often fall asleep mid-scroll.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Dark mode and reduced brightness 24/7, and I don’t think I use a blue light filter, but the black and white night mode comes on when I charge my phone at night. But I’m also looking at regular monitors until about 10 min before I go lay down, so idk.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Interesting, thanks for the response. Same as my situation except I use the blue light filter on most if not all my devices. I am so used to it, don’t even notice that it looks kind of orange anymore.

          • Hoimo@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I’m running CF.Lumen on Android which lets me turn the color all the way down to 1000k and I’m still so used to it that it’s only “kind of” orange to me. Most people can’t help but comment on it when they see it though. The default “night light” on Android is so weak, I don’t even know why they bother including the intensity slider. It slides from “no effect” to “barely noticeable”. Is there anyone who sets it to anything but full power?

            I also go full red-scale after midnight, which is noticeable even to me. Web designers, please check your UI with a grayscale filter to make sure every element has a decent contrast with its surroundings. In the meantime, I can easily switch back to 1000k when the red is hindering me.

    • pixelscript@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s bad for me, but not for that reason.

      It’s bad for me because I piss a whole hour or two of my morning away doomscrolling. That makes me late to work. So I end up staying later to make up lost time, I get home late, and then I wonder why I have no time at the end of the day to do anything…

      I’m doing it right now, in fact. I will stop.

        • RinseDrizzle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Lolol I maybe just sit on the throne for 5 minutes longer than I should 😂. But what, am I meant to sit on the throne and read a magazine, like a dirty commoner?? 😤

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Can confirm. I used to have sleep issues (like anyone else in the 21st century). Now I love jumping into bed because I go out like a rock

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Scientism is bad for you

    Edit: To all the downvoters, I’m not dissing Science. Science is a wonderous method for finding the truth of the universe. However Scientism is the logical fallacy that all there is to know is known by science already and can only be known by science. Or in essence, treating Science as an infalliable religion, when even scientists will not do that if they value their jobs.