• blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Jesus explicitly said He was not making any rules obsolete.
    What He did was tell and show that OT laws are supposed to be read from the perspective that they are meant to help and protect the weak and “lesser”.
    And the OT is a history of God’s love for humanity as much as the NT.

    • M4thG33k@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I was thinking more about the things such as animal sacrifices and temple rituals, which were law prior to Jesus. But he did say he came to fulfill the Law, thereby making those practices obsolete since He became the ultimate sacrifice.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        There was actually a dispute among the early Christians about whether or not they were still subject to the Law. James, the brother of Jesus, who led the church in Jerusalem took the view that Christians should still follow it. St Paul, for whatever his motives might be (Josephus speculated that Paul was an agent of the Jewish elders whose job was to detach the Christians from the Jews, in hopes the whole thing would fizzle out), held the view that the Law was fulfilled and also that Christianity was open to Gentiles.