Summary

Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell claims Republicans fear criticizing Donald Trump due to threats against them and their families.

He says Trump’s social media attacks provoke harassment, forcing lawmakers to consider costly security measures. This fear, he argues, is eroding GOP support for Ukraine and discouraging opposition to Trump’s policies.

Other figures, including Liz Cheney and Mitt Romney, have echoed these concerns. Elon Musk has also pressured Republicans by funding primary challenges.

Some GOP lawmakers reportedly faced FBI warnings of credible death threats for opposing Trump-backed nominees.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 minutes ago

    Guess we’ll just just have to threaten them even more physically to get the results we want then

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Wait until the threats against them for criticizing Trump and those for not protecting their subsidies and pork barrels cross the equilibrum and start to shift the balance.

    • kescusay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yep. Fascism doesn’t work without a dedicated cult of personality, and that’s exactly what Trump has with his legion of MAGA asshole-idiots who are willing to commit violence for their messiah.

        • Sanctus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Because if we actually did what they did for the Civil Rights, show up to DC in the hundreds of thousands, they wouldnt have the balls to call the military death squads. Without even entering, we would win. No man is without fear. Everyone is scared. You either allow the fascists to take over or you dont. There is no path that allows a peaceful way forward without action.

              • peoplebeproblems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Tiananmen Square had like 1.5m people at one point. Thousands hurt or killed. But that was just army tanks and soldiers.

                They didn’t have any of the fancy dispersal shit they do now.

                Plus if there were ever a march the size of the March on Washington, they’d close access to DC.

                No bridge crossings, no ferries, no subways.

                • Sanctus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  The Civil Rights protestors didnt care about any of this (though they couldn’t care about Tiananmen yet).

              • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                22 hours ago

                I mean, that’s like 3 or 4 missiles from a helicopter or drone. The US military would logistically have no problem taking out that many people.

              • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                16 hours ago

                There’s plenty more bootlicker MAGA loyalists, who all have enough firearms to equip quadruple their numbers and pacify a crowd double that size. You underestimate their rabid stupidity, which is how these dipshits got into power in the first place. Fuck Trump and fuck MAGA, but dont forget Democrats are all toothless finger waggling pearl-clutchers and allowed this to happen.

              • WagyuSneakers@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                23 hours ago

                No, they absolutely still would. The amount of people means less than nothing. That is absolutely on the table with them.

              • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                17 hours ago

                Looks like a target-rich environment for raking belt-fed machine gun fire. Tiananmen Square had a lot of determined, angry people show up too.

                Might wanna pack more than some picket signs.

  • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 day ago

    Some GOP lawmakers reportedly faced FBI warnings of credible death threats for opposing Trump-backed nominees.

    I’m not saying it’s not entirely true because we’ve been hearing about this for years. But given who is in charge of the FBI now, I wonder how many of these “credible threats” are actually credible vs. how many of them are actually just made up by Patel to make sure they stay in line.

    That said, it’s one thing for a civilian to not want to put themselves in a position where they could be harmed. They didn’t sign up for that. Civilians are largely in no position to do anything about it. But Senators and Representatives? This is literally what they fucking signed up for. This is what we grossly overpay them for. This is why we spend so much for their security. We elected these people and empowered them to do what we can’t.

    Maybe if we start seeing a couple of these town halls full of angry people exercising their 2nd Amendment rights live and in real time, they might get the message.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m not saying it’s not entirely true because we’ve been hearing about this for years. But given who is in charge of the FBI now, I wonder how many of these “credible threats” are actually credible vs. how many of them are actually just made up by Patel to make sure they stay in line.

      If the people saying there are death threats against you are the same ones who are supposed to investigate them: There are death threats against you. It just might be a fed holding the gun.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I wonder how many of these “credible threats” are actually credible vs. how many of them are actually just made up by Patel to make sure they stay in line.

      Well, he only just took office this week, and this crop of death threats have been reported for a month or so now. But I absolutely believe that Patel is going to try to return the FBI to its J. Edgar Hoover days of gathering komprimat on every single person in the country. We’re gonna need another MEDBURG soon.

  • pathos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is called ‘stochastic terrorism’. Publicly painting people in the most outrageous light until some of your acolytes feel called upon to realize the supposedly non-commital threats you made.

    Fuck Trump. Fight the fascists.

  • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    You know, something like this can’t happen in the USA because of the Second Amendment. I’ve learned this from countless of dudes on the internet that screamed endlessly about it, so this must all be a dream. Only woke nations line Nazi Germany can fall for this 🙄