It’s both a hazard for emergencies as well as a hygienic nightmare. We all see the people leaving without washing their hands!

  • Moghul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    We have outwards opening bathroom doors in the office and they’re great for giving people concussions and bumps on their head, as well as knocking coffees out of people’s hands. When we pass these doors in the hallway we put our hands up like our abusive dad went for a high five.

      • Moghul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        TBH I want to know where they were when this building was built. Who came up with this and who allowed it?

          • Moghul@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Nope, it was built within the last 10 years. I don’t know what Danish building codes are like but these are definitely built different from everywhere else I’ve been in Denmark

  • karet@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Thank you! Same exact thought, I was telling my friends this a while back, and they said I was making no sense

  • Chris@rabbitea.rs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I believe it’s to do with hand cleanliness. When you enter, you push the door as your hands are dirty (maybe shove it with your arm or something), then when you leave your hands are (supposed to be) clean so you pull the door as it’s a nice clean handle to grab.

    I don’t get it either, but that’s what I’ve heard as the reason.

    • GunnarRunnar@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      If I’m sure about one thing, it’s that people are disgusting. I’d much rather avoid touching the door after using the toilet when my hands are clean. And even in the case that the door is disgusting, you can wash your hands both before and after.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I can see this for a stall (think someone falling over and blocking the door, or one of those really tight bathroom stalls where you really have to shimmy to get yourself into the stall), a bathroom door itself not as much.

      • Hanabie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        The moment your elderly mom has a stroke on the toilet, you’ll look back at all the times you got the door in your face and be grateful. What a tiny price to pay for the life of your mother.

  • the_boxhead@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m not an expert (at all), but I presume that opening a door into a thoroughfare risks hitting someone with the door but opening into a room only risks a person ready to leave (and approaching the door head on?)

    Just thoughts…

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      One compromise might be touchless door handles

      I’ve also seen these at my school, but it doesn’t work for all doors since the door needs to be light enough

      Neither of these are that accessible though, and I can’t find photos of the better ones

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        accessibility shouldn’t prevent improvements, we can just add the foot handles and handicapped people simply keep operating doors like they currently do.

        They’ll still be exposed to fewer germs so they benefit anyways.

        • Otter@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          That’s fair, both options can exist at the same time in this case

      • spader312@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’ve seen something similar for your arm. It’s larger and at arms length so you can use more of your body weight to pull it open

      • dingus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        The arm one is dumb because I’ve seen people with unwashed hands grab it. The foot one makes more sense. Although it’s not accessible like you said.

        • scubbo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          The arm one is dumb because I’ve seen people with unwashed hands grab it

          So? If I can manipulate it with my sleeved arm (thus keeping my hands clean), it’s still working pretty well. Sure, I’d prefer not to have my sleeve contact something that someone’s unwashed hands have been on, but better that than my hand.

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve only seen doorless toilets in large well ventilated spaces such as some train stations. I don’t think that would go well inside a shopping mall or a restaurant

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I got through most of the post/comments thinking this was about stall doors…

        • Otter@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Some of the comments might be about stalls, but I think most of them might be about the door to the bathroom itself. Since a person would wash their hand after leaving the stall and before touching that door, and with a pull door you have to touch that handle.

          I realized it with this comment since a doorless stall sounds like a nightmare

      • Mothra@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Eh, it’s unclear honestly. After reading some comments I realised op maybe meant the direction in which doors open, not the fact that you have to open doors. I don’t know

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    We need those cool and unnecessarily complicated sci-fi doors that open with multiple stages or like a camera aperture or a Stargate iris.

  • mrbubblesort@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Inner doors should swing inward because in case of a fire or other emergency, you don’t want to be trapped inside by something blocking the door that you cannot deal with. Even in something were preventing it from swinging open (like a rope or whatever), in theory the person could still get out because the door hinge would be located on their side and they could simply remove it.

    • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Also because the hinge would have to be on the outside if swinging outward and thus not be securable. As the hung pins could be removed and door opened while locked.

      • acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        There are locking pins to secure outward swinging doors. Though fire and safety reasons are really why the doors swing the way they do.

    • Zippy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      In large building some code requires exterior doors to swing out as pressure build on a fire could jam the door closed. Also some exits require push bar which is swing out.

      The in swing though makes sense for more smaller buildings and internal doors. Not wacking people and not getting blocked in seems the better method.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I just eat with dirty hands. No matter how hard I try to be clean I will always end up consuming filth one way or another so now I dont worry about it. I’ll take a shit, not wash my hands and then pick up a slice of pizza no worries.

    • toothpaste_sandwich@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s right who cares about other people touching what you touch with your shit hands. Shouldn’t be around you if they don’t want that.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Anything in public should be assumed to be dirty. If its not me fuckin it up someone else will.

          • Fizz@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Its impossible for things in public to be clean. I am not making things worse. I am just not neurotically worrying about things that dont affect me.

            • Hyperreality@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              You are. Roughly 48 million food borne illnesses per year in the US, in large part due to people not washing their hands.

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foodborne_illness#Epidemiology

              Also Noro-virus:

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norovirus

              A large part of prevention is handwashing.

              Also, Cholera:

              https://www.cdc.gov/cholera/preventionsteps.html

              Have a guess what prevention step 2 is.

              You go around with shit particles on your hand, infecting everything. You’re a typhoid Mary. Even if you’ve never been ill after eating some food (which I find unlikely) it’s not unlikely that you have made people ill, and maybe even killed someone with a weakened immune system.

                • Hyperreality@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  The US has relatively low levels of food borne diseases. It was an example.

                  Also parasites, like hookworm:

                  https://www.healthline.com/health/whipworm-infection#prevention

                  Up to a quarter of a billion people are infected worldwide, in large part due to poor hygiene.

                  Then there’s round worm, likely a billion people infected globally. Once again, due to poor sanitation and hygiene aka handwashing.

                  But hey, you do you.

                  Just know that at this point you might as well stick your thumb up a strangers ass then lick it. It’s fundamentally not that different to not caring about washing off shit particles before eating food.