reading the list of ideologies “harmful to the global south” and comparing it to the ideologies that the global south has tried and gotten results from and drawing no conclusions

  • DrCrustacean [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    9 months ago

    Incredibly funny to me that anarcho-feminism and queer anarchism are in different tiers. Like yeah dude let’s start ranking liberatory struggles good idea, tell me which types of anti racism are “very cool” and which are just “aight” next

  • RedQuestionAsker2 [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s actually sad to me how low Ho Chi Minh thought is.

    Vietnam resisted US imperialism and won. They haven’t been the target of such a focused propaganda campaign like DPRK or China. There’s no reason to believe they’ve done anything wrong. No atrocity propaganda comes out of Vietnam. They mind their own fucking business and try to help their people.

    And still, STILL it’s not good enough for western leftists. It’s fucking pathetic.

    • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      9 months ago

      yeah i can’t imagine being an anarchist who places any importance at all in your tendency label. like do you have a body of theory that you value? no not a page on the /r/PCM wiki, i mean something that someone who wanted to drive a stake through the heart of the state wrote.

  • Redcuban1959 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    9 months ago

    harmful to the global south

    Chavismo

    Maoism

    Ba’athism

    Juche

    Ho Chi Mihn Thought

    Harm is when you improve the country and the living conditions

  • culpritus [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    9 months ago

    Making a tier list of how effectively different ideologies have been able to improve material conditions, but making it upside down on purpose.

  • Alaskaball [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    4 tiers of “Hasn’t made a material impact on the world” and one tier of “Has made a material impact on the world”

    I’d move Anarcho-communism/syndicalism down to the bottom tier because they also had material impact on world, while moving nazbol, “unconditional accelerationism” and… I think it says Ujaman? The green one on the very berry bottom. No offense but I haven’t heard of it. Anyways, move those three out of there, and lastly merge Leninism, Marxism-Leninism, and Stalinism into one, because thats just repeating yourself three times.

  • ReadFanon [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Platformism: good
    Leninism, MLism, etc.: counter-revolutionary

    Council communism: aite
    Titoism: counter-revolutionary

    Liberation theology: aite
    Leninism, MLism etc: counter-revolutionary

    Egoism, anti-civ: not counter-revolutionary

    Make it make sense…

    Also this person hasn’t read any Ho Chi Minh thought, nor Nyerere or Juche theory, I would bet money on this.

  • glans [it/its]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    how is “post civ” very cool but “anarcho primitivism” no bueno?

    aren’t they the same thing?

    edit: and "anti civ"is in the aite row.

    • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 months ago

      “some people on twitter said that anarcho primitivism is based, but some other people said it’s equivalent to fascism. i cannot be bothered to find out what their arguments actually were, and i have never actually read any critiques of civilization because my interest in the topic extends to finding a new polandball guy to draw, so i’ll uncritically download and repeat both opinions as my own.”

    • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      anti/post “civ” is a different critique from the primitivist one, its not about technology but like the ideological/cultural construction of “civilisation” and its opposite “uncivilized”.

      i’ve read some okay takes on it, but its not like a full political programme. not that that stops these reddit idiots trying to invent tendencies, lol