• Sjmarf@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Lemmy.world censors only “faggot” and the N word. Lemmy.ml censors “bitch” and various slurs. I believe their users can still see comments with these words in (?), though the censored words are removed if they post them themselves

    • Borger@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      Am I missing something? I have absolutely no idea what you guys are talking about.

      Is there a slur somewhere in this post or the comment section? And TIL that Lemmy communities can censor words. I’m from blahaj.zone btw

      • Sjmarf@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        Lemmy instances are able to censor words; it can’t be set per community. When viewing a comment from an instance that censors some word, that word will be replaced with “removed”. This applies to both comments sent by users of that instance, and comments sent by external users.

        Blahaj doesn’t censor any slurs

        • Borger@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Ah, thank you for explaining.

          Bizarrely, the reason I’d asked the question at all is because your comment that I’d replied to was rendered as a top-level comment rather than a reply to another comment.

          So I was wondering if, rather than individual words being censored, entire posts/comments were being hidden, but not replies to them. I guess that’s actually just a bug or something, because I can see what you were replying to now.

          I’ve had this experience of feeling like I’m not seeing the full thread / that someone is replying to something I can’t see a handful of times. It’s a weird one.

      • Sjmarf@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Aha, so it seems that other instances do censor external comments for their own users. It was “fag-got”.

    • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      feddit.uk doesn’t censor anything at the moment, because I accidentally broke the slur regex.

      Normally, users from censored instances can still see rude words, they just get removed “in flight” if they try to post anywhere.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Well the first one has basically one meaning that’s derogatory (including the definition of a bundle of sticks used for kindling; that’s literally why it became a slur as it implies you want to burn them) while the three letter word is also slang for a cigarette in much of the world.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          removed and fag are used interchangeably in much of the world. Both have other means, both are derogatory and both mean gay.

          Makes no sense to censor one and not the other.

        • xantoxis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          The 6-letter version means a bundle of sticks, or a stick, which is how it came to mean cigarette. The 3-letter version is an abbreviation of the 6-letter version. Both of them mean cigarette, and both of them are an anti-gay slur.

        • mokus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m no historian or etymologist but I saw one on YouTube once who said a very similar term was used for poor older women who supposedly went around hunched over all the time picking up sticks for firewood, and then was later transferred to homosexual men to imply they were weak, effeminate, outcast, etc