So I’ve realized that in conversations I’ll use traditional terms for men as general terms for all genders, both singularly and for groups. I always mean it well, but I’ve been thinking that it’s not as inclusive to women/trans people.

For example I would say:

“What’s up guys?” “How’s it going man?” "Good job, my dude!” etc.

Replacing these terms with person, people, etc sounds awkward. Y’all works but sounds very southern US (nowhere near where I am located) so it sounds out of place.

So what are some better options?

Edit: thanks for all the answers peoples, I appreciate the honest ones and some of the funny ones.

The simplest approach is to just drop the usage of guys, man, etc. Folks for groups and mate for singular appeal to me when I do want to add one in between friends.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Y’all doesn’t get enough love. It is gender neutral and extremely versatile.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          if you’re less formal

          What a fun way to phrase that. You’re not wrong but it’s making me giggle.

        • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I still wonder why English (a Germanic language) doesn’t have its own pronoun for the plural 2nd person like German (euch) or Dutch (jullie), I think it kinda helps with distinction between talking to one person and talking to multiple people.

          The problem is… what pronoun should we choose? I think “yinz” would sound kinda cool, but nobody outside of a very specific spot in the US actually uses it (other than myself I guess).

    • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I agree. It’s the plural of “you” that should be the official standard, since it disambiguates “you.” It can even be broadened to include larger groups via “all y’all,” as in, not just y’all in talking to, but all y’all in the house.

      It can replace “guys”, but not “man,” though.

        • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Well, you don’t have to yield, because it’s correct. My issue isn’t that you isn’t plural, it’s that it’s both singular and plural, and therefore ambiguous. IDGAF whether we normalize y’all, or thou in the other direction, or yous as someone else mentioned… but “you” needs to pick a fucking lane.

          • Makeshift@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Thank thou for being someone other than myself that’s annoyed at English having the same dang word normalized for both singular AND plural for such a common and important word.

      • clif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Do you work with me? I’m in the US south and my EU colleagues love “y’all” and have started using it (ironically or not :) pretty often.

        Warms my heart.