• 401 Posts
  • 518 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 16th, 2019

help-circle












  • State capitalist is kind of a meaningless term, what matters is which class holds control over the political and economic system.

    So some of the nordic states might have a comparatively high degree of state ownership and employment (compared to other capitalist states

    ), while still having a capital stand above the politics and economy.

    Whereas in China, Cuba, Vietnam, the communist party stands above the economy and directs it via X-year plans.

    Lenin’s quote on the distinction is good, and probably the main reason we should ditch the term altogether.

    The state capitalism, which is one of the principal aspects of the New Economic Policy, is, under Soviet power, a form of capitalism that is deliberately permitted and restricted by the working class. Our state capitalism differs essentially from the state capitalism in countries that have bourgeois governments in that the state with us is represented not by the bourgeoisie, but by the proletariat, who has succeeded in winning the full confidence of the peasantry.







  • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.mltoAsklemmy@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    What prevents any other anarchist grouping from claiming the hierarchy you prefer isn’t justified?

    however I sternly argue that that does not necessitate a state.

    Lets make this simple: A bunch of oppressed people group together and use violence to defend their interests. What prevents any anarchist from calling that an “authoritarian redfash state”?

    The “freedom” of the capitalist class is the freedom to extract surplus value from workers. Should that freedom not be challenged? When workers do exactly that, don’t capitalists and their defenders start whining about the sanctity of “freedom”?






  • No probs! This is a very detailed account of the history, negotiations and details around the winter war. Remember also that Finland crushed their own workers revolts in 1919, and were part of the alliance attacking the USSR in the russian civil war / revolution, as they were to do again in ww2 alongside nazi germany.

    The safety of Leningrad (which was within artillery range of Finland, and which had been attacked in the previous decades by Finland, Britain and Germany, and which Finland later assisted nazi germany in nearly starving leningrad’s people to death), was the primary issue of the winter war.