🖕 Fuck PayPal

And fuck Linus Tech Tips for intentionally keeping quiet about this after they found out.

  • M1nds3nd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Ever since it was explained that Mr. Beast only smiles with his mouth, I get skeeved out every time I see him.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I guess most people don’t have much knowledge about affiliate link URLs and how easily they can be rewritten to shift where the commission goes. I implemented SkimLinks on a hunch of websites so I’ve seen it before. Forum owners used to get upset about anyone posting product links in their comments because they night include an affiliate code. SkimLinks adds JavaScript to every page that rewrites those codes to the forum owner’s personal account. It will even insert an affiliate code into basic Amazon links that don’t have one. Once this came out, forums went a lot easier on Amazon links.

    After seeing all this, the second I spot a browser extension that wants to get between me and Amazon, I immediately assume they will rewrite all the links for their own benefit. Otherwise what’s in it for them? This news isn’t much of a surprise.

    • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      32 minutes ago

      The biggest issue that this video brings up is that businesses can filter out certain coupon codes if the discount is too high

  • azalty@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Just open their privacy policy and done. They sell your browsing info, and you could stop it there

  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I don’t really wanna watch a video… but how do you “steal” affiliate links or coupon codes?

    If you are doing affiliate marketing for a company and they give you a coupon code for 10% off called GET10OFF and that code gets used, the affiliate marketer gets the sale no matter where they got that code from?

    • Googlyman64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      54 minutes ago

      He says that when you click on an affiliate link, a cookie gets stored on your browser that lasts for 30 days, saying that the source should get the commission for your purchase. Honey has a popup in checkout, even when there are no codes, with a big “Got It” button to close the popup. Clicking the Got It button replaces the old cookie with a Honey cookie, giving the commission from your purchase to them instead of your source.

    • kofe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      56 minutes ago

      I’ve slept since I watched and am not great with tech, but iirc the link with the affiliate code when clicked takes you to the site. Then honey has a pop up that, when clicked, replaces the link with their own, swiping the commission. Hope that makes sense - most people likely would not catch it. The Linus tech tips was used as an example of even a tech channel with lots of employees taking quite a while to notice themselves, and even when they did, it wasn’t quite conclusive for some reason?

      Another thing the video touched on is that honey would claim to search for coupons but often opt to show what the partnered companies want. So, could be there’s a coupon for 50% but they only show 10%.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        22 minutes ago

        Ah gotcha. So what I said about coupon codes would be valid, but affiliate links are different than the coupon codes. Also crazy they hide bigger discounts.

        Edit: But I guess they could find a company offering a coupon code, then sign up themselves knowing it’s an option now, and then show that code instead.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        And Honey has always worked like this. So PayPal knew exactly what they were buying which explains the price tag. Paypal knew they were going to make their money back and then some.

    • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I never trust browser extensions outside of a select few. However, I have used Paypal quite a bit. I would think many of us have.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Was it all that surprising to you though?

      By the time honey hit the scene we had been ten years into “sketchy Browser extension that monitors your browsing habits and injects ads”

      I guess getting flogged by your favorite influencer ads a veneer of legitimacy for a lot of people.

        • eRac@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Rakuten is up front about it. They force their affiliate links, then pay you part of their cut.

          Honey forces their affiliate links in exchange for maybe finding you a discount code.

          • gt5@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I also think Rakuten compensates me fairly. I take the payout in Amex points. Instead of money they give me 1 cent per point which I can leverage to a value of around 5 cpp through transfers

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    If something advertises on youtube it’s a scam. Simple to remember really.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      This isn’t even remotely true. There are lots of advertisers and sponsors that aren’t scams. But unfortunately our consumer protection laws haven’t quite caught up to the digital marketplace. So there is a lot of room on the internet in general for scammy behavior.

      As always, it’s buyer beware. As well as a big amount of content creator beware as well.

    • frezik
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I don’t mind things that are an actual thing to buy. I want to research it first–you can get a better electric razor than Manscaped for not much more–but at least it’s clear how they make their money. Honey was obviously getting money from someone other than their users, and that’s an immediate red flag.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I and many other people naturally assumed that honey was getting their money from consumer data collection. Which is why I didn’t use the service myself. The surprise is the fact that the scam isn’t just consumer data collection but actually stealing commissions from content creators as well as using consumers as a gateway to stealing money from businesses that they have contracts with.

      • riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah. PayPal bought a coupon browser extension for how much? If the only thing they do is save YOU money, how come they can afford a sponsored segment in a mr beast video?

    • frezik
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They didn’t hide it, but a huge portion of their audience doesn’t read the forums. A 10 minute video of Linus ranting about them would have opened this scandal to a wider audience years ago.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        There may have been non-disclosure agreements between Linus tech tips and PayPal Honey. They may have threatened to sue him if he went public. I’m assuming we’ll find out the details in the next few weeks.

      • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Linus usually likes to rant about it on the WAN show then they usually make a clip for YouTube, but weird he didn’t do that for honey, maybe he didn’t know how far the scam went.

        • zqps@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 hours ago

          As creator that makes some of their profits from affiliate links, I don’t see how that could be the case for him.

          Seems more likely they had a reason to avoid beef with PayPal.

    • poke@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Some very vocal people on Lemmy just love hating on LTT. I don’t think this topic was worth them making a main channel video on, I think their forum post was good and I believe they even mentioned this functionality of Honey a few times on the WAN show. It wasn’t a secret, and anyone who cared to do in-depth research on a potential sponsor could have found out.

      • sardaukar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        And yet here’s the scandal being exposed TWO YEARS LATER. Yeah, LTT couldn’t possibly have handled this better… /s

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yeah, that not nothing but it isn’t far off. They have a massive platform. It deserved at least a video telling people about it.

  • pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Honestly I thought all of this was common knowledge at this point, back when I used Honey (many years ago) I saw its affiliate code in the address bar and thought “huh, that’s how they make money”

    • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I remember researching it a while ago when I was curious how they made money. If anything else, this just illustrated glee little research and care people have with their online information.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      OP isn’t exactly giving you the full story there. I know for a fact I’ve seen a video on this. I remember thinking at the time “well duh”.

      • Whelks_chance@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 minutes ago

        It is. Taking from a service without paying for it, and actively avoiding the service making money via advertising is basically the same as watching a film without paying for it.

        Both ways, you consumed a service and the people providing it got nothing, but it cost them something to create and provide it.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        It…is? You’re copying digital content without paying for it. I use uBlock but I don’t pretend to have the moral high ground.

      • themakara@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Have you ever heard his full stance on the matter? Because he clearly stated that this is not a judgment against using it. Heck, he’s been open about having sailed the high seas himself and still doing so for media he physically owns.

        It’s just that gaining access to media while circumventing the payment (ads in this case) is basically piracy. Which is fair.

        Signed, A uBlock User

    • galanthus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It was a matter of time until the public found out about this. They couldn’t think in the long term, by not accepting a bit of backlash, exposing the scam they unknowingly participated in they only opened themselves up for more later.

      They are not only evil, they are stupid too, which is worse.

  • shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I have been using PayPal increasingly for online payments. Not sure why. I have heard old stories about PayPal but Honey seems really bad. Its basically a given that any fintech company are going to be dodgy scammers but PayPal seemed almost grown up and respectable. Guess not.

    • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Maybe use privacy.com instead (they also have an app), they can generate virtual credit cards and you can set limit is (one time payment, or monthly $10 only, etc). It’s great if you need to cancel something or if they try to charge you extra. Saved me $150 when boost tried to charge me 1 year after I bought a phone from them!

      It’s also great for predatory services like GYM membership that you can’t cancel.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I use Klarna for basically everything I buy. I should probably reevaluate that. But I’ve had no issues so far. It notifies me when my payments are due. Helps me collect the sum of what I owe each month, each week. Helps me group payments to pay similar/connected things simultaneously, categorize purchases, etc, etc.

      I really hope there’s nothing dodgy going on there. But at least I’m not giving them interest on anything I buy. Always make sure I’m paying my stuff on time, and no postponed payments.

      I’m guessing their business model is to exploit people who have issues paying on time and to collect interest and late fees, as well as receive convenience fees from stores implementing Klarna as a payment option.

      • kchr@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I really hope there’s nothing dodgy going on there

        In 2023 they got a 1.1 million SEK fine for breaking the law that regulates working hours. To “allow” (strongly encourage) your employees to work nightshifts you need a collective agreement approved by the union, which they didn’t have.

        More recently, they got a 500 million SEK fine for skirting the anti-money laundering regulations in Sweden.

        But at least I’m not giving them interest on anything I buy. Always make sure I’m paying my stuff on time, and no postponed payments.

        The whole “buy now, pay later” deal is a credit loan. They are most likely paying the merchant directly and using your loan as collateral to speculate on the market, until you pay them back for that loan. If that’s true, they are making profit on the interest gained from your loan.

        I’m guessing their business model is to exploit people who have issues paying on time and to collect interest and late fees, as well as receive convenience fees from stores implementing Klarna as a payment option.

        Correct. Like all credit banks they promote the “buy now, pay later” option before direct payment, which is becoming a pandemic on our society. Hardly any user interaction needed. They also offer their own payment plans which encourages buying even more expensive items you cannot afford.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          44 minutes ago

          The whole “buy now, pay later” deal is a credit loan. They are most likely paying the merchant directly and using your loan as collateral to speculate on the market, until you pay them back for that loan. If that’s true, they are making profit on the interest gained from your loan.

          I’m not very educated in economics, so I’m struggling to understand this. Is there a way to easily explain this? I’m 38 so… please use big words if you like, but simple domain language. 😅

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          46 minutes ago

          Yeah. I definitely don’t think I’m the target audience for their service. Paying everything on time, every time. Buying only what I can afford. Etc.

  • jagermo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    212
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    I said it in another post: if you see a bunch of influencers all suddenly peddling the same stuff, stay away. All of them can be bought.

      • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        What annoys me the most is since his last drama, Linus HAS to be the face in every video now! Wtf it used to be a bunch of them took turns making videos, and it was fun seeing everyone work on different things. He has to be front and get all the attention, it just feels weird now.

      • archonet@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Am I the only one who, upon seeing his videos for the first time, immediately thought he was an annoying little pinhead?

        Like, I’ve watched his channel(s) surge in popularity over the years, and this entire time I’ve just been wondering why, and the issues that have come out about his little empire since have only confirmed my initial prejudice.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I’m with you. I heard of him on Reddit forever ago and couldn’t get through a single video.

        • stardust@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Their entire video is an ad filled experience of shilling not only their sponsors but themselves. Incredibly obnoxious and cramming in every YouTube stereotype from begging for likes and subs to clickbait titles and then insisting they have to do it so they can have their cake and eat it makes them even more obnoxious than if they just did it without wanting to be forgiven for it.

          • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            11 hours ago

            It’s getting worse, I can’t remember who but I was watching a video just the other day and their ad segment was the fucking ltt ratchet driver. You know, the one they supposedly made because they were tired of the market and the low quality rip-offs all the companies were just trying to make profit off of (it’s a shitty plastic screwdriver for 70$, link to pic and it’s being sold at fucking walmart now). They sold it as such a heart string story in the beginning, it’s just another mini-wannabe corporation.

            I don’t particularly feel bad at this point for their continued reputation downfall and the people responsible. Everyone has their own personal story of their favorite company which has turned to complete shit (Blizzard is one of mine). They didn’t come out strong but doubled down corporate style when everything started. That’s fine, but anyone staying and putting up with the stressful workplace knows what they’ve gotten themselves into.

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              Oh please attack them on actual grounds rather than a made-up nonsense. The screwdriver is actually decent product if you care about that sort of thing. No one’s getting scammed there, It’s an actual product that’s of relatively good quality.

              If you don’t care about screwdrivers then you’re probably not interested in the product anyway and if you are a frequent screwdriver user you probably understand why it’s a good product.

            • frezik
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 hours ago

              That’s actually a very nice screwdriver. Nice ratchet screw drivers do cost that much. I have one, but given where LTT is these days as a company, I don’t recommend buying it.

              I would be very happy if creators were able to fund their operations off their own merch rather than outside advertising. That seems to be what Gamers Nexus does, or at least heading that way. What LTT does, though, is use it as an additional revenue source on top of their other advertising sources. Doing it right means resisting the urge to consume more and more, and LTT is not capable of that.

            • CybranM@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I have a few gripes with LTT but the screwdriver is legit good. A bit overpriced because of the branding sure but definitely not a throwaway product

            • snooggums@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I used to think the importance of leadership at the top of a company to be overblown since they succeed based on the work of all of the employees, but it is pretty amazing how fast a change to shitty leadership can run a successful company into the ground.

        • toynbee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Because of his name, I thought he was a pro-Linux channel. I was swiftly disappointed.

          • Canadian_Cabinet @lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            He once bricked his OS during a “run Linux for a week” challenge. He tried to do apt install steam or something and ignored a bunch of warnings. Of course he then bashed Linux because he didn’t pay attention

            • toynbee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Yeah, I didn’t see that video, but I recall reading about it. Apparently the package manager warned him that something would be potentially destructive and he ignored the warning, then blamed Linux for it when it was destructive.

            • toynbee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I’m not exactly sure what you’re saying here, so I apologize if I’m misinterpreting, but - while I have many potential complaints about Linus - I don’t blame him for his name resembling the word “Linux.”

            • toynbee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I have nothing clever to say here, so normally I’d let my upvote express my feelings, but that feels inadequate in this case. I just wanted to use my words to let you know that this comment amused me a great deal and to thank you.

        • HornedMeatBeast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I got that creepy feeling from him the first time I saw a video of him. Every photo of him I saw set off alarms. I’ve also never understood why anyone even likes the guy.

          This was years before all the issues came to light.

    • lemmeout@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I have a built-in spidey sense that hates any product that gets peddled simultaneously by a bunch of YouTubers.

    • pixelscript@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      There is no such thing as a free and benevolent product with an advertising budget.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Free and benevolent maybe not. but genuine and non malicious?

        “What’s your business model?” “we make and sell delicious sandwiches. Customer buys the sandwich for a little mote than it costs to make so we get money for ourselves.” That isn’t a scam.

        • pixelscript@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Correct. It’s not a scam. Because it’s not free. The sandwich had a price posted, you paid it, you received the product. Valid business model.

          What would you think instead if you saw a NYT front page ad taken out for Free Sandwich Mart, the all-you-can-eat totally free sandwich emporium?

          Or in this case, a free browser extension that paid to sponsor five thousand YouTube videos that promises to help you pay less money to every store you activate it on at no cost to you?

          • snooggums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            They have a budget spent on advertising on wikipedia itself, plus the cost of the emails they send out asking for donations.

        • amzd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Their advertisement budget is collected by guilt tripping Wikipedia users using the lie that the website would cease if they didn’t ”donate”.

    • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Real as shit. I know idiots who think apple pays people scaling on how many downloads their app has xD (kinda like yt views)