• VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Onion aside, what bothers me is that it is in the interest of many key party members to take a more aggressive stance. Trump and the GOP have vilified individuals like Pelosi.

    When the majority of average Americans start feeling the shock from the changes that are being made Trump is going to want a scapegoat. No one is better suited for this purpose than key party members that he has been brainwashing people to believe are literal devil spawn. He has even threatened to execute certain people. Unless you have an escape plan(wouldn’t be surprised if some do), surely you must realize that this is an eventuality?

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      sure. I dont think that should bother you. Lets take Schumer as an example. Read his wikipedia page and look at his “accomplishments” over an entire career. He’s never stood up and pushed hard for a single thing his whole life. He’s never led a charge. Is he not worthy of being pilloried as an impediment to progress? And Pelosi, she has fought AOC and Talib much harder than she ever fought republicans. She’s grown very rich on insider trading, and fought hard against the imposition of ethics in that regard. Is that true or is it not?

      Both championed war crimes, along with Biden. True or not?

      These people were always opportunists taking advantage of us. That the republicians also hate them is coincidental, not an applicable defense of how awful they have been in failing to lead the party over time.

  • Tronn4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This is a more viable action from them than the usual roll over and get fucjed

      • Crikeste@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Democrats are currently holding meetings crying about the pressure they’re getting from their constituents. If those spineless pieces of shit are who you’re expecting to turn this shit storm around, you’re going to get smacked in the face with reality really fast.

        What are democrats doing now? Nothing? Oh, and you think I should support that?

        Your bullshit “SUPPORT THE DEMS NO MATTER WHAT” is the exact reason we are where we are today.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        So what’s the people with actual power we voted into office to stop Trump doing?

        It certainly isn’t even voting no on his choices. They aren’t protesting in the streets. They aren’t hauling the construction of labor camps.

        A literal king is being put into place they just sit on their hands going “We need just $5 from you today to stop this!”

      • ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        So…

        What are the Dems doing, to combat this? I’m seeing very little action.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          “No if you don’t like that people with power and money aren’t stopping Trump, you clearly support trump!”

          I fucking hate the one dimensional thinking liberals brainwashed themselves into.

      • ansiz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I mean if the Dems can’t even try to resist then they are guilty by association. They have just rolled over. Look at how well the Republicans did against Clinton or Obama when they were the minority. The Dems share the blame here.

          • Dale@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            32
            ·
            20 hours ago

            And we can be mad at them for not doing their jobs while Trump and Musk use the American constitution to wipe their asses. They had the presidency and the majority, got us nothing but status quo, and now are doing jack shit to stop a Fascist takeover.

      • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Dems are still blaming 3rd party voters that turned away from their tone-deaf genocide party.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      They can’t do anything except block and delay bills.

      They can’t filibuster cabinet picks or court confirmations. They can filibuster bills but the only bill in the process of discussion is the federal budget and the Republicans win whether it doesn’t pass and shuts down the federal governments or it does pass and cuts a trillion in benefits that help american working class so they can cut taxes for the rich.

      So they can do nothing.

      • ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        They can obstruct. And they aren’t even doing that.

        They can radicalize people to resist the tyrant.

        They can do an awful lot with that Bully Pulpit they all have, by nature of their office.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          They cannot obstruct cabinet picks or judge appointments, since 2013 and 2017 respectively.

          They can obstruct bills such as the new budget proposal by fillibuster, but that will cause government shutdown and the Republicans win either way, tbh. (I think they should filibuster it, but I expect people like you to complain either way).

      • TheresNodiee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        23 hours ago

        America is experiencing a fascist dictatorship and you want the only party speaking against it to just stand by because the system doesn’t allow them to do anything??

        How about FUCK THE SYSTEM!!! Trump and his cronies don’t care about it. You’re not going to beat wanna-be dictators with 0 disregard for the law by doing everything by the book.

        Block the doors to the house and Senate rooms, encourage and participate in civil disobedience, get operatives to physically block Elon and his felons from illegally accessing extremely sensitive data about America’s allies and citizens. Loudly and passionately call out every anti-democracy, anti-American, and anti-human act that Trump and his gang are doing and explain exactly how it’s going to enrich them and other billionaires and how it’s going to seriously harm everyone else. Encourage and work with grassroots organisations across the country to gum up the MAGA Republican works.

        The Democratic party leadership are should be the leaders of a movement defending against the destruction of America and it’s allies from within the country’s highest positions of power for the benefit of a small few wealthy and powerful people. This is a historical moment that is very likely to lead to the suffering and deaths of countless human beings within America and around the world, and could possibly lead to a world war the likes of which we have never seen. I want them to fucking ACT like it.

        They need to do more than read dry, impassionate speeches and post boring tweets. America is dying and if the country is expecting the system to save them then chances are they’re already lost.

        • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          A few weeks back a bunch of Democratic Congresspeople went to the Department of Education with a whole media circus in tow, and were blocked from entering by a single small man, who couldn’t have weighed more than 150lbs soaking wet, who claimed to be hired by Musk and working for the federal government despite not providing any ID. The Democrats gave up and left.

          Like fucking what? Are you kidding me? You are members of Congress! Just fucking push past him! Either that security guard has the authority to keep you out, in which case they’d have to go through the terrible fucking optics of arresting a sitting congressperson for accessing a government building, or he doesn’t actually have the authority in which case you have a duty to tell him to fuck off.

          They’re just spineless.

          • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Yeah exactly they are too comfortable taking no for an answer. They should have even asked permission they should have barged in. If they were truly representing me that’s what they would do. Any kind of confrontation and they just cave.

        • Sundray@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          As much as I agree with the sentiment, it’s not going to be elected Democrats putting their bodies and personal freedom on the line; what we need are more Anarchists, and support for Anarchists.

          The closest thing I have to a point is that on a Federal level, the Democratic party is a corpse. At best I think it could be resurrected as the supporting “acceptable” political wing of a larger movement that also includes a direct action wing that actually sets the movement’s agenda. But I’m afraid that’s just as much of a fantasy as the idea of pampered technocrats standing up to get their heads bashed in by US Marshalls.

          • untorquer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            43 minutes ago

            Think it’s on the same level of expecting cops to risk their lives for the safety of people when there’s no risk to property.

  • Sundray@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    Genuinely curious what people want the Democrats to specifically do right now, apart from vague calls of “something” and “more” and “better.” At least on a federal level, aren’t they pretty much powerless at this point? What even can they do?

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago
      • Vote no on everything like Republicans did when Obama/Biden tried good things
      • Filibuster every bill like Republicans
      • Give motivated members of Congress more power, like AOC
      • Retire the old blood of the DNC and have people with ideas from after 1982 enter office (my state allows office vacancies to be filled by appointment until election)
      • Listen to the Americans who voted for you to stop Trump and stop whining about that in private meetings
      • Stop voting yes on anything Trump wants
      • Don’t ratfuck young faces because they are running in seats with old people
      • Don’t say everything is okay and normal despite the fact it’s clearly not, it didn’t work both times they ran on it as a platform
      • Sundray@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        All great ideas. Have you mentioned them to the Democrats? They are depressingly poll-driven, but it’s probably worth directly reaching out. My local congress people are probably sick of my shit by now, but if so – good.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      What the Repugs do whenever they’re in the minority: complain loudly and publicly, and obstruct absolutely goddamned everything.

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I want Dems to start arming the working class. Like, empty the campaign coffers, and use it to buy guns, bullets, and butter for the working class.

      How’s that for a start?

    • JillyB@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      My interpretation: the right is broadly successful because they are presenting a compelling narrative to explain the problems in America. It’s “elites” in business, government (deep state), and schools that are pushing an unamerican agenda of “wokeness”, using immigrants to gain power, and indoctrinating through schools and universities. This is enough to get people to vote right because at least the right is doing something to address their concerns.

      What the Democrats need to do, is present a more compelling narrative. They can’t just be the “non-maga” party. They have to actually address people’s concerns about economic insecurity and present a vision for the future. I remain convinced that the first president that runs on economic populism will sweep an election.

      • LoamImprovement@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Yeah, I remember in 2016 when the Hillary campaign’s response to “Make America Great Again” was “America is Already Great” and man did that go over like a lead balloon. Democrats fucking love to pretend everything is okay.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          And then Harris did the same and wondered why she lost.

          “Everything is okay! Sure you can’t afford food, rent, housing, the government spends more on wars than social services, but I might give those with millions a few hundred thousand to buy a house! And I’ll appoint a Republican to my cabinet!”

    • SwingingTheLamp
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago
      1. Figure out what they stand for, stated in two sentences. (From that old chestnut that says that you don’t understand a thing if you can’t explain it in two sentences, or less.)

      2. Learn from the experts (PR people, psychologists, neuroscientists, screenwriters, etc.) how to state it in ways that resonate with people.

      3. Then, do it. Convince all of us that they care, and are trying. Build coalitions around the message, and strengthen civil society.

      The greatest damage from this administration’s lawlessness does not come from tearing down government agencies, it’s the corrosive effect of hopelessness in the minds and hearts of the citizens as we look around and feel like we’re alone, and that nobody else actually cares about our laws, traditions, and principles.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          16 hours ago

          “We’re second worst, you have no choice but to vote for us, and we will only move right” might have resonated with you.

        • SwingingTheLamp
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          When did that happen? Their messaging is pretty widely regarded as terrible.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Because it was so rehearsed and prepared. They needed the opposite, which is what trump and JD Vance did. Podcasts and shows where they just had casual conversations. The experts and linguists and whatever else were a horrible idea.

            • SwingingTheLamp
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              I’m not sure what you’re talking about. Harris’s message was along the lines of (from a Lemmy comment, TBF), “address disparate health care outcomes that predominantly impact Black men.” Nobody even knows what that means, much less has the ability to remember it. Or, she had some talking point about a several-thousand-dollar tax credit. (I don’t recall how much or for whom.) That is, they talked like policy wonks, not in terms like “dignity” and “providing for your family” that reach people emotionally.

              Their opponents said highly memorable-but-evil things like, “Haitian immigrants are eating the pets.” I mean, like that, but good. Or, when you think of Obama, there’s one word that immediately comes to mind. Like that.

              ETA: I just remembered one of Harris’s other leitmotifs for the campaign: “We’re not going back.” Just awful messaging. Democrats constantly, constantly, go for the negative formulation, which is terrible messaging. For one, saying you’re not your opponent lets your opponent control the terms of the debate. Also, our memories and subconscious minds are bad with negatives. Like the famous pink elephant example, if I were to say, “I’m not a professional dogcatcher,” a week from now, you might have the vague recollection of u/SwingingTheLamp and dogcatchers, or maybe just dogs. If I were smart, I’d say, “u/SwingingTheLamp is such a sexy guy” instead.

              This particular example doesn’t suffer from that problem, but on the other hand, it doesn’t say anything of importance. So we’re not going back, great, we already knew that, but where are we going? It doesn’t say anything emotionally-impactful about the future and Harris’s role in it. By contrast, “make America great again” is much better slogan, because it makes a promise about the future. And a vague one, so you can seamlessly fill in whatever you think “great” looks like, and you can actually envision a perfectly-tailored picture of the future. Harris == discontent about the past; MAGA guy == good-feels about the future.

              • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                12 hours ago

                What democrats saw from trump is much different than what republicans saw.

                For example, her interview on fox, most democrats saw clips of it, rather than watch the whole conversation. Most democrats aren’t aware of just how many podcasts trump went on. Most know about rogan but thats about it.

                I agree with how you frame the messaging from democrats, but I dont think it was because they didnt pay the right people to write their slogans, I think it was because all the had were slogans.

                Hands down, trump was the more personable candidate, which should be extremely upsetting to the democrats, but instead they have blamed voters for being too stupid to understand they were the good team.

                • SwingingTheLamp
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  Okay, yeah, I get it now. I think we agree. That’s what I was saying originally, it’s that they skipped Step 1, the part about deciding on the substance behind the slogans.

            • daltotron@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              14 hours ago

              They need to have rehearsed and prepared talking points because that’s the only way they’ll actually come across as standing for anything other than the status quo, which is deeply unpopular. Most democrats probably don’t even know what they even theoretically stand for without a corporate donor explicitly telling them what to do, and most of them can’t do improv on the level of even being able to make shit up or lie in the absence of that, much less to charmingly lie by omission or tell the truth by technicality.

              • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                12 hours ago

                I’m saying the status quo IS the rehearsed and prepared talking points. Whether they are honest or not, its not what people want, and they dont trust it. Having casual unscripted conversations without restrictions, like trump and Vance did on podcasts, is a great way to appeal to people directly. Theres a reason these podcasts have millions of subscribers.

    • coyootje@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      113
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, I’m not an expert by any means but haven’t the republicans been able to very efficiently stifle democrat majorities before? If they just follow that playbook (delaying things, being pains in the ass, constant insistence on funky rules) they can at least annoy the shit out of them and hopefully slow things down. They’re way too polite for that tho, they’d rather just let it happen and hope they come out okay in the end then to risk the wrath of the annoying orange and his minions.

      • SmokeInFog
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        100
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        One thing they could do is stop voting with republicans to confirm Trump’s appointees. Have you seen. how well the Republicans obstruct? They can get everybody in their rank and file out on network TV to call for banning a book by title while the democrats can’t even get their best faces on TV to call what’s happening with NY’s mayor blatant quid pro quo corruption

        EDIT: Trump energy chief says there are upsides to ecological collapse

        • stopdropandprole@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          agreed. that’s literally their job. oppose the other party by whatever means at their disposal. use the press, support union actions, so many ideas. be bold be creative.

          they at least should stop pretending that “playing by the rules” and “trusting the system” is an appropriate response to illegal orders, illegal firings, violations of constitutional doctrine, and open defiance of judicial and legislative oversight. relevant video from InnuendoStudio, sadly aged like wine

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          You can’t filibuster cabinet picks or federal judges, meaning the Dems cannot stop Trump appointees, either. The Republicans have 53 senate seats so they can pass whoever they want.

          • ubergeek@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            The GOP needs every single person on their side to pass the nominations… Which rarely happen.

            Why aren’t the dems working whatever GOPers they can to say no? Or is that something only the GOP is allowed to do? Get Dems to defect?

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              14 hours ago

              False, Hegseth is the closest to losing confirmation when 3 GOP voted no, but VP tiebreaker confirmed him anyways.

              Hegseth, Vought, Gabbard, Kennedy, and Lutnick all recieved 0 dem votes and passed.

              Only 3 Republicans have voted against any confirmation, and Mitch McConnell is the only republican to vote against more than one: he voted against 3.

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          26
          ·
          1 day ago

          Only if the appointees are bad (which, since it’s Trump and “stuff up the deep state” project 2025, there’s probably a lot of bad appointees). If we obstruct appointees that are good, we’ll just keep seeing the pendulum swinging when a new party comes into power.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Democrats need to pass progressive reform to win. Republicans need to stop progressive reform to win. They’re playing different games.

        For example, Republicans are gutting Medicaid and Medicare in their new budget proposal and the only thing Dems can do is block the bill which will defund those programs regardless.

        Zero win conditions.

    • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not lining up to bend over for republicans would be nice a nice start. Even a quarter the obstructionism as the republican party has put forth when Democrats are in charge would be appreciated.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Speak up, speak loud and speak often. Be the leaders of the grassroots organization they pretend to represent.

      • Sundray@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        They seem to be incessantly tweeting and Facebooking, but people are complaining that that’s not very effective.

          • Sundray@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            It seemed to work for MAGA. Maybe the Democrats need more bot accounts? Shittier shitposts, maybe?

            • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              1 day ago

              Workers strikes, general strikes, work stoppages and walk outs … organize people to conduct mass disruptive activities in a peaceful obstructive way to force those in power to either move against them or take steps back to accommodate people.

              • Triasha@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Strikes need strike funds. Dem billionaire donors are not going to fund picket lines and unions (half of which majority voted for trump) are not going to sacrifice their livelihoods for what trump has done so far.

                Mass protest is possible, but it won’t come from organized labor unless something changes drastically.

                Congresscritters could do a little more to gum up congress. Stop confirming his nominees except for the 3 sane options.

                As others have said they will have a chance to negotiate when the shutdown comes due. We will see.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      The next real test will probably be the budget vote in the House. Post-Trump Republicans have historically been unable to pass budgets without democrat help, even when they had a majority, so one thing democrats can do is squeeze the GOP dry for concessions before helping them pass the next budget.

      • Sundray@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Agreed. Can anyone think of somebody the Progressive wing and the mega-donors can agree on?

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Mega donors can’t eat their money. The working class WILL get behind a strike, if they see support from the electeds.

          • Sundray@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            14 hours ago

            What will the working class eat while they aren’t getting paid during the strike?

            • ubergeek@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              12 hours ago

              We already produce the food… oligarchs don’t.

              We can seize the means of production.

      • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Surely this will be an Onion link

        Oh, for fuck’s sake…

        Also, please don’t link to Xitter.

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      When eighty million Americans sat out the election they sent a pretty clear message that they’re okay with whatever Trump and Co wants to do.

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          14 hours ago

          When eighty million Americans sat out the election they sent a pretty clear message that they’re okay with whatever Trump and Co wants to do.

          • ubergeek@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Bo, the6 sent the message of "both of these are atrocious human beings, so I will support neither "

            • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              12 hours ago

              By choosing neither they threw their full support behind the winner which was Trump.

              There is blood on their hands from the choice they made.

              • CaptSpify@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                10 hours ago

                I always find it telling when someone blames the people who couldn’t stomach to vote for an openly corrupt, genocidal party, instead of blaming the leadership of the party for being openly corrupt and genocidal.

  • NoMadLadNZ@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Jeezus, they need to only have people under the age of 50 to revitalize any messaging. An anthem from a washed up pop star celeb is not going to do shit. Celebs are a turn off. The election not 3 months ago proved that.

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    They’re preparing a stockpile of spears and chainmail so they can rule uncontested over whatever is left of America by the end of the year.

  • Wren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Considering what they’ve done so far… I’d say it’s an improvement.

  • psyklax@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Maybe the democrats need a media apparatus to propagandize people against whatever the republicans want to do 🙄

  • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Oh, so they’ve finally decided to do anything at all? I wish this wasn’t the Onion, because I’m really starting to think the democrats got what they wanted when he was elected.

  • GooberEar@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I assume this is a new/newer song? I am not sure I’ve heard it, and if so, I certainly didn’t know it was Katy Perry’s “Roar”.

    • expr@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      It came out in 2013, so no, not new at all. It was an incredibly popular song, with over a billion listens on Spotify.