• pingveno@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s usually covered under fair use doctrine in the United States, though there are limits. More specifically, it must be both transformative and noncommercial.

  • ganymede@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I used to think “bit pointless, but whatever makes people happy”

    recently i realised the potential in recreational reimagining of things, if nothing else it might be a nice ‘exercise’ for our mind.

    truth be told, most hollywood adaptations of a book are basically high budget fan fiction.

  • pingveno@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    It can be fun to have a different take on characters. This is especially true for crossover fanfics or fixit fanfics in the case of source material with plot holes or other flaws.

  • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t really bother with it myself, as I have enough trouble reading primary sources, but there is a huge community out there that is creating ongoing interest in various works and settings, and I have trouble seeing how that can be a bad thing.