• Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Its a 6 sided bear, the peak of the polygonal phylogeny.

    Monomouse

    Duodugong

    Traye-aye

    Quadferret

    Pentacoyote

    Hexbear

    Heptaherpeton - this is the furthest we’ve discovered in the polygonal phylogeny but research indicates the likely existence of an octorca as well

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Octoria are scientifically impossible, the grazing territory requirements alone for a sustainable breeding colony would be immense. Any reports of them in the wild are either misidentified pairs of quadferrets copulating, or hoaxes perpetuating the psuedoscience.

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        quadferrets copulating

        That’s where you’re messing up. Those are pentacoyotes, not quadferrets. The contact side between two polygonimals mating is actually obscured, so the actual number of sides in a copulation configuration is the sum of the sides of all involved polygonimals - 2. Therefore the octorca could not be two mating quadferrets, but could be two pentacoyotes, or a chain of duodugongs.

        • Agent641@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Youre quite right, rookie mistake by me. You would think a Polyphylogenonomist would know better.

          However, wouldnt it be more accurate to say that the actual number of sides in any given copulation configuration containing n polygonimals would be n*(sides per polygonimal)-(n-1)? Assuming we exclude tricopulations of hexbears where any given individual may be contacting two other individuals’ sides at the same time in a tessalation layout? I must admit im not certain though, my field is polyphylogenomics, not polyphylogenomatics. Im sure there are some edge cases Ive missed, pardon the pun.

          • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            My bad, I was thinking in terms of simple intraspecies pairing like they taught us as undergrads. Once you get into polypolys and tessellations the math is frankly beyond me. Well spotted though.

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    A large part of it is a fanbase of Chapo Trap House which has a particular brand of humor that is rampant with esoteric inside jokes that are vulgar as a point, let alone to the extreme.

    That humor, especially without that frame of reference, usually offends your average internet denizen.

  • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Left-wing social site (might be fedi, never bothered checking) for leftists who are way too edgy for mainstream leftist communities.

  • Illegal_Prime@dmv.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think it may be referring to the people who blame all social ills on “corporate greed” and think that belong leftist is exclusively being anti-capitalist. I think this may go along with some pro-Putin/pro-Xi viewpoints, possibly because they believe that “the west” is bad and capitalist, Andy anyone who opposes it is anti-capitalist and good.

    I’m glad I know who these people are, so I can be more careful of them. Both here and on Reddit it felt like I was trapped in a bubble with these guys.

    • FaeDrifter
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Tankies are politically incomprehensible, because they claim to be queer-friendly communists, but support insanely queer-phobic bourgeois dictators like Xi and Putin.

      They are vulnerable to the same online radicalization as alt-right bubbles. They say things that get increasingly insane, because it gets them more and more internet points and attention, until they start believing their own outrageous hyperbole.

      For example, I have one tankie currently trying to unironically argue with me that the UK is a vassal state to the US Empire. Like we’re living in Star wars and he’s the rebel alliance that is bringing down with evil empire with lemmy shitposting.

      • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        For example, I have one tankie currently trying to unironically argue with me that the UK is a vassal state to the US Empire.

        Why are you posting your Ls lmao

        • FaeDrifter
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I mean, he’s making the US sound 100x more badass than it actually is. Who’s taking the L there?

            • FaeDrifter
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Bad at losing because you’re a global hegemony that pulls all geopolitical strings.

                • FaeDrifter
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  It’s funny to trace rhetoric back a few years before the Russia-Ukraine war, when there was so much Internet and social media hype over Russia as a superpower, their military overtaking America:

                  https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Russia military US before%3A2020

                  Then suddenly there’s the invasion, and suddenly it’s revealed that the hype was all fake, Russia was bluffing on its military, they are mostly poorly trained, with ridiculously outdated equipment.

                  And suddenly tons of internet media commentators do a massive 180, and there’s so much rhetoric about how being a global superpower is bad.

                  Is being a global superpower bad, or do people say it’s bad just because Russia isn’t one after all?

      • geophysicist@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        At this point we need to assume they’re Russian shills and the queer-friendly stuff is a ruse to have a fallback to always claim the moral high-ground

        • FaeDrifter
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I 100% believe there’s Russian shills in the mix, but I think most of them are normal people who are frustrated with the status quo, and vulnerable to aome targeted manipulation. It’s also exactly how Russia targeted the alt-right.

    • DrRatso@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Because, Id wager, their userbase is primarily edgy leftist teenagers, really kind of like if 4chan was left and not right.

      • airportline@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Can confirm, was an edgy leftist teenager on hexbear right when it was started – after r/chapotraphouse was banned.

      • Gork@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        They’re so far to the left I don’t even consider them left anymore. They’ve fully wrapped around to be indistinguishable from the right (but not racist so much as intensely totalitarian).

          • Gork@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            When did I say I was minimizing the Holocaust?

            I’m saying that both are authoritarian. Both are incompatible with Democracy and the current rules based international order, which when working correctly can prevent genocide from occurring (i.e. if the UN peacekeeping missions actually do their job).

            • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              rules based international order

              What rules? Who do I report the USA to for repeatedly violating all of the rules and killing millions of people around the globe?

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 years ago

              When did I say I was minimizing the Holocaust?

              You are equating them. Read the link from the mainstream Jewish holocaust scholar to understand why that’s holocaust trivialization.

              • Gork@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                the Bogus moral equivalence of the Holocaust has been from the time of the actual massacres the myth that the Jews were all Communists and got what they deserved because Communism was every bit as genocidal as Nazism. Hence what the Jews call the Holocaust is a kind of opposite and equal reaction to the first genocide, the crimes of Communism.

                First of all, this was not what I was implying. I never said that Communists were equally as genocidal as Nazis, nor that I deny that the Holocaust occurred. Putting words in my mouth is arguing in bad faith.

                I am saying that the Tankies on the left support the same type of authoritarian policies that are prevalent on the right. While actions like, for example, the Tiananmen square massacre are not as large in scope as the Holocaust, accepting the CCP party line on the issue is antithetical to human rights, just as any massacre is. Supporting authoritarian regimes that do this is, in fact, just as bad regardless of whether the party is “left” or “right”.

                Did the Holocaust occur? Yes. Did it result in the death of millions of Jews at the hands of the Nazis? Yes. I’m not disputing any of these facts, so please do not suggest that I am denying the Holocaust.

                • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  You literally said this

                  They’ve fully wrapped around to be indistinguishable from the right

                  You are free to retract this. Could you say for me “Communists are in no way morally equivalent to fascists”?

                  Also to be clear I’m accusing you of trivializing the holocaust not denying the holocaust.

  • Maeve@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    You know, Bob Altemeyer wrote a book about rwa, if anyone’s not read it, it’s illuminating. At this juncture, I’ve had way too much Nazi authoritarian propaganda, I’d like to hear the other, and be free to ask questions and form my own opinions. That hope was doomed from the jump, and I should’ve guessed.

    • Rinox@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Eh, I thought the same, but then after reading their comments, it’s like going from one authoritarian extremist ideology to another authoritarian extremist ideology. Especially when both pro Nazis and pro commies seem to both boil down to being just pro Putin fanatics. I’m wondering if the propaganda doesn’t come from the same place trying to capture both spectrums.

      • Maeve@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        If you’ve read the book, hard right authoritarianism and hard left authoritarianism are both right wing authoritarianism.

        Eta: oh wow. That’s insane.

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I saw what I think was a post by an admin asking if lemmy world should defederate with hexbear and I don’t recall ever seeing hexbear posts or super trolly or racist or commie posts/comments. I’m with you, op. I have no idea what’s going on, and I suspect it’s better that way.

  • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s a bunch of woke lefties that want to tax billionaires and shove their gay agenda down my throat. They hate honest hard working landlords and CEOS and shill for the lazy poors.

  • GoldELox@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    my problem with this thread; u can’t tell who is actually communist and authoritarian, and who is just authoritarian

    • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Leninist/Stalinist/Maoist/“Left” Authoritarian Communism is just authoritarian nationalist state capitalism that uses classist rhetoric instead of (or as well as) racist rhetoric.

      And before people call me a tankie: Anything authoritarian is trash-tier shit.

        • bi_tux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Not every right wing extremist caused the holocaust, and besides, if you compare all right wing extremists with the nazis at their peak power, you could also consider yourself a stalinist for downplaying his actions by simplifying history as some people I disagree with

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            If you compare right wingers with little power to left wingers with little power you get mass shooters vs mutual aid enthusiasts.

            If you compare right wingers with a lot of power to left wingers with a lot of power, the fascists have a spectacular kill count and the left wingers are less bad than the bourgeois democracy baseline.

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      They don’t give a shit about worker enfranchisement - they’re all right wing fascists, it’s just that some of them are red-coded.

    • Blackmist@feddit.ukBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The difference is whether you get sent to a concentration camp or a gulag.

      Oh, I guess they are pretty similar…

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Uh, depending on the concentration camp, not really.

        I don’t want to defend gulags but they didn’t have poison shower rooms or child corpse disposal staff.

        Working your slaves to death sometimes, sure, but you mostly came out the gulag alive.

        Broken, but alive. Historians estimate that of about 20 million people sent to the gulags about 1.5 million died in them.

        Which is a horrific example of compliance through terror but not quite the same thing as an extermination program.

        Don’t minimize the Holocaust on your way to agree with everyone else that tankies are delusional assholes.

        • yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I don’t want to defend gulags but they didn’t have poison shower rooms or child corpse disposal staff.

          Neither did concentration camps:

          "Interned persons may be held in prisons or in facilities known as internment camps (also known as concentration camps). The term concentration camp originates from the Spanish–Cuban Ten Years’ War when Spanish forces detained Cuban civilians in camps in order to more easily combat guerrilla forces. Over the following decades the British during the Second Boer War and the Americans during the Philippine–American War also used concentration camps.

          The term “concentration camp” and “internment camp” are used to refer to a variety of systems that greatly differ in their severity, mortality rate, and architecture; their defining characteristic is that inmates are held outside the rule of law. Extermination camps or death camps, whose primary purpose is killing, are also imprecisely referred to as “concentration camps”."

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internment

          Don’t minimize the Holocaust on your way to agree with everyone else that tankies are delusional assholes.

          The singularity of the Holocaust lies in the extermination camps, where millions of people were murdered with industrial efficiency:

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extermination_camp

          Saying that concentration camps exist(ed) in other countries is not Holocaust relativism.

            • yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              No, I don’t know which ones “he” meant, because nobody mentioned Nazis, and apparently you still haven’t understood the difference between concentration and death camps, and assuming everyone here is male is also kind of yuck you know.

              • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Sure bro. You’re making an honest argument in a comment chain that has used the phrase “authoritarian nationalist state capitalism.”

                Fuck all the way off, this isn’t Facebook, people know what you’re doing.

                • yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  This comment chain doesn’t have the words “authoritarian nationalist state capitalism.” in it, and you don’t know shit about anything, go back to facebook.

                  I’m also not your fucking “bro”, asshole, get lost.

        • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Just for information the death count of gulags is largely unknown. Russia itself says its 1 million but pretty much all other sources say its too low to be even believable. There are credible sources for 1.5 to 8 million deaths (also non-credible sources that go much higher). Unfortunately unlike the nazies, soviets did not really have record keeping at all so all sources are estimates based to prisoner and guard writings. Another factor that makes estimates hard is the practice of when a prisoner was near death they would be shipped home, a lot of those never made it home but don’t count as killed by a gulag.

          There was also mass deportations from satellite states that weren’t sent to gulags presumably but that’s a different thing.