I seriously cannot have any degree of nuanced conversation here.

Like I get it, we all know capitalism is bad, but it feels like every time I or anyone go towards discussing the steps that need to be taken to address current looming problems in the short term, someone has to jump in and shut it down with "capitalism bad >:[ " and tear down any idea presented because its not complete and total destruction of the current economic model.

The result just feels like an echo chamber where no actual solutions get presented other than someone posting whole ass dissertations on their 33-step (where 30/33 steps are about as vague as “we’ll just handle it”) plan to fully convert the world to an anarchist commune.

Edit: I still vastly prefer Lemmy and the fediverse and a whole, my complaint here is that many of you are TOO INTENSE. You blow up small scale discussion.

    • KnightontheSun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Agree. Reddit was the same thing if not worse. Nuance is [apparently] dead and if you do not explain everything from the dawn of Man to cover your thought, people pick the comment apart like carrion as if you’ve never thought about anything deeply before. They might even gloss over things you did say and attempt to invalidate or discredit your post because only they hold the Truth of the Internet handed down from the Elders. It can be a bit frustrating.

      • Deceptichum@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Did you even consider vegans don’t eat decaying flesh? You cant just hold everyone to your standards. I’m not even going to bother reading the rest of what you wrote because you’re so fundamentally wrong already that I’m confident i can stop there and not miss anything of substance.

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      IMO, it’s anywhere that has a voting system in place. Every forum has a hivemind, but the hivemind is especially reinforced when fake Internet points are at stake. That, and moderators yanking comments they don’t agree with.

      • Deceptichum@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Its not about the points, its about the weighted value.

        Higher point posts go up higher snd are seen by more people. Lowering posts makes them less prominent.

        You can go for a system of whoever posts first gets their comment to be first, leading to people rushing low quality crap to be at the top. Or most recent comment first, giving you a shit experience like browsing a discord for information. Or random post order, where high quality content gets buried under a sea of shit.

        Ranked voting is the best option we’ve found that works online so far.

        Personally I downvote shit all the time if i feel its not more worthy than other content. Everyone should be judging posts according to their own metric so we can average out content across a communities views.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          The system was a lot more useful when it showed up votes and downvotes separately. I was stoked when Lemmy came out and that was the default display. Now they seem to have removed that even as a user config option, which is very disappointing. People perceive something with 20 downvotes very differently than they do something with 380 upvotes and 400 downvotes. Showing an average skews people’s perception and helps create a hive mind response approach. People don’t want to reply if their reply might be controversial, because it looks like they’re just being shouted down. And then people who agree don’t want to respond and say they agree, or they’re just jumping into the fire with the first person.

          • na_th_an@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            I still see separate counts in the web UI. And I agree that separate counts are essential information. I think the level of discourse on Reddit dropped significantly when they hid the separate up/down counts.

            • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              I think the config option is set per instance. Some of them have it, some of them don’t. And then a lot of the popular apps don’t support it, even if your instance has it.

              • nutomic@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                There is no option like this, it was probably changed in the app you are using.

                • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I checked the website too, and it was combined. I checked again just now and it’s not combined. Weird! I have instance hopped a few times, so it must have been whatever instance I was on at the time.

        • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          I 100% agree that this is how it should work, and it doe work in more objective communities, particularly tech-oriented ones such as troubleshooting. The issue lies in subjective conversations, where people are debating their opinions, especially politics.

          If the vote counts were hidden, it likely wouldn’t be an issue. But in practice, it turns conversations into an opinion popularity contest if the topic is of a more subjective nature (I’m right, you’re wrong, yada yada).

          The other important metric to this is that a significant number of people simply lurk with no interaction whatsoever. While participation is key to determine a proper weighting of content quality, it’s not like there’s a mechanism for forcing participation. And if there was, a good number of people probably wouldn’t even bother if there were such a requirement. Ultimately with link aggregators and microblogging, people just want to consume content (including comments) while keeping to themselves.

        • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          Both the web interface and various apps still have the functionality in place (though I think the individual user can disable it). I think that since a lot of Lemmy users are reddit refugees, the mentality carried over unfortunately. That said, hiveminds and echo chambers are kind of human nature, so it’s pretty hard to escape; ultimately it’s on the individual to either fall in line or ignore it.

            • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Ah maybe not total but separated, still though, simple math. I’m on Voyager more than my desktop so I don’t really see the web UI very often.

              • can@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                simple math

                Go ahead and try to add up my my comment karma lol.

                ETA: if your app shows an aggregate this is because it wasn’t removed from the API. This is an oversight as noted on the github.

          • nutomic@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Karma is removed in 0.19, curious where you still see it. Anyway its impossible to calculate correctly for remote users, because there is no guarantee that the local instance has fetched all posts from that user, and all votes on those posts.

          • can@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            It was removed from the web ui but was still left in the API.

            dessalines:

            Public karma counts and karma farming are one of the things we really don’t want to replicate from reddit, there was a discussion about it for lemmy-ui, and it was decided to stop showing them because of how psychologically harmful it is.

            We should’ve removed these a long time ago from the API. As a substitute, you can show the post_count and comment_count instead of those scores.

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        You need some way to order stuff. How would you prefer to order content if not by votes? Isn’t votes at least a somewhat democratic way to do it? And much like democracy, it might not be great but I have no better ideas.

        • MBM@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Traditionally, forums just sort by time. Doesn’t scale that well for big places obviously

    • hono4kami@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Yeah, but I feel like it’s worse in Reddit and even WAY worse in here. I’m not sure I wanna keep using Lemmy anymore. Or threadiverse as a whole

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    It is quite often that responses seem to come from school age children who just discovered [insert edgy counter-culture ideology], and all of their responses and world views revolve around a rudimentary desire for that ideological utopia, with very little consideration given to sociology or economics. I suppose that is actually who’s responding a lot of the time. All real world considerations are discarded, and any issues you identify are perceived as stupid/shill/Trumper/dummy/capitalist drivel with zero consideration given.

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      I do notice and kinda agree that some users here are great at arguing about theory, but can’t see beyond that for practical application.

    • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Agreed, often if you check the post history of folks like that you’ll see that they’re still in school.

    • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s precisely it. It’s manufactured outrage created by kids trying to look Worldly. The same about when on when I was in school- and it was every bit as cringy.

    • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Theres truth to this but I think the general sentiment is archaic and overblown to the point it’s almost anachronistic.

      It used to be that cohorts would grow more conservative as they aged - trying to keep everything like they know, essentially. This was true when we built societies that allowed generations to prosper.

      We don’t see that seismic shift in millennials or the older zoomers. We see the opposite. Millennials onward are actively moving further left, not just appearing further left because the Overton window has shifted. If anything, the window shifting, casting those in the center as “left”, hasn’t pulled the left to center, but the other way around. It’s pushed the center to be more open to the lefts ideas. The left still convulses at the centers ideas, trust me (like student loans).

      This is one of those opinions that everyone likes to assume is part of the silent majority but there’s just not that as much evidence to back up the confidence in which it’s announced - which, remember this, is 100% the main tactic of those in the center. This is the “end of history”, everything’s figured out, inability to see beyond themselves that makes leftists say neoliberalism (the prevailing media world view, center-right) is a cult or that liberalism is a mental illness -the former I agree with, the latter I do not.

      Once this tone is dropped, its a mine field of red flags representing the death of nuance, that we’ve reached the limits of their rationality and critical thinking.

      Just like breaking thru the rights MAGA cult, breaking the centers techno authoritarianism is like explaining 3D to Flatlanders. And if that sounds like gobbledygook to you, you’ve either been completely sheltered (and in that case, buckle up, things are waaaay worse than you were told growing up) or you’re fully indoctrinated into either ideologue. Blinders on. Kamakazi away.

  • GlitterInfection@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    I find Lemmy significantly worse than reddit was in this regard. The number of times I’ve had my different (not unpopular outside of lemmy) opinion met immediately with personal insults is way higher here in the few months I’ve been here than my years with reddit.

    I’ve just been learning not to engage on any of the lemmy propaganda areas, and that leaves me with a lot less active communities.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I agree, and attribute that to the kind of people who would boycott Reddit forever, where the largest part of the lemmy population seems to originate from.

      As much as I roll my eyes at the overuse of the term, lemmy is mostly comprised of the "woke"est of the reddit population.

    • phillaholic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ve found the same and sadly when I open Lemmy up I see the same half dozen articles still at the top of home. I’ve done back to Reddit on Mobile where there’s still a ton of new content.

    • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I seem to have a knack for pissing off fanboys. There’s no use using logic and reason.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Lemmy is less ban happy than reddit, so I don’t mind throwing down in the comments. Do your part, fight against stupidity.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Sure, but have you tried using Linux, going vegan and guillotining billionaires?

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Like I get it, we all know capitalism is bad, but it feels like every time I or anyone go towards discussing the steps that need to be taken to address current looming problems in the short term, someone has to jump in and shut it down with "capitalism bad >:[ " and tear down any idea presented because its not complete and total destruction of the current economic model.

    That is literally why my instance finally defederated from .ml Every 3rd comment from someone there was exactly that regardless of what community you were in. It was exhausting. Lemmygrad and Hexbear were already blocked here, and once the .ml peanut gallery was gone, it was like “wow, this is kind of enjoyable again”.

    Do I miss a few FOSS communities that were more active there than their counterparts elsewhere? Yeah, a little. But, overall, the experience is just so much better after they were blocked. It’s not even that I really disagree with them on everything, it’s just…STFU already, stop brigading, and maybe say something constructive for once.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      Hexbear were already blocked

      Yeah things were so, so much worse before that happened. I finally blocked the whole instance in my client so I didn’t tear out all my remaining hair.

  • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    I dunno man, I didn’t come here looking to contribute to or find a plan to fix the world. I came here to doom scroll and look at memes.

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is my big problem with online spaces. Yes it’s great to demand that everything should be different, but I’ve spun on this planet for a few decades and all I can say is change happens slowly.

    We’re still dealing with the fallout from slavery and it ended over a century ago. A decade ago I fought for gay marriage and I thought we won, but it’s still being contested.

    Keep fighting for change, but know that we need to focus on small victories. Places like the US are not going to give up capitalism in the next year. Or the next decade. Or century. What we can do however is push for strong regulation, housing, and rights.

    Nuance here is important, and I agree dropping the “everything bad is bad” talk is key. We all know it’s bad, but a country is a big ship, and a big ship takes a very long time to turn around.

  • workerONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    11 months ago

    I actually appreciate the flow of opinions and information from people with other viewpoints and political opinions. Yeah people can be too intense like you say. I’ve really enjoyed learning about politics from a communist’s perspective. I was sort of blown away by people who disliked liberals but their talking points weren’t those of the American right wing. They were leftist communists, and their viewpoints are really fascinating. I’ve really gone into the rabbit hole learning about class warfare and historical actions of communist countries. If people are trying to spread their viewpoints they should be able to make compelling arguments to support the things they advocate for. I’d be happy to digest more communist information/propaganda/marketing it’s really well thought out stuff.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    In fact I agree with your “echo chamber” comments, by design the servers and communities foster a group of like-minded individuals and the moderation is enforcing the same kind of thinking and rules.

    At the same time, I find it more possible to get nuanced takes, back and forth discussion that isn’t just troll bait or shouting matches here on Lemmy than elsewhere. People approach some topics with more curiousity, are a bit more willing to admit they are wrong/corrected about something and listen to each other’s perspectives. Productive communication is a two way street. There’s still a group of jerks, trolls and bad actors, but it’s a monumental effort to moderate them away and they’re virtually inevitable in any populated anonymous online space.

    I don’t really mind if something is downvoted for being unpopular unless it’s an obvious troll/flamer. That includes people that talk about capitalism’s benefits. I know there are cases of missed references or sarcasm, I am a proponent of /s to avoid misunderstanding for that reason.

    What sort of thing would you like to have a nuanced discussion on?

    • RedAggroBest@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      Really just the half steps and the means to make progress towards a better system that works for the benefit of the majority, y’know, socialism. It’s a bottom up discussion that always gets taken over by the top-down people who can only ever talk about the whole shebang.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        There are no satisfactory “answers” on how to make progress. Because the only actual answers are painfully and slowly. By educating and convincing others. So it always boils down to impatient revolutionaries trying to do it by force. Fundamentally failing, and setting everyone back again and again.

        Even Marx phrased it as “evolution” not revolution. And like you said it starts from the bottom up. Revolution has only made the educated and ignorant alike fearfully clutch to capitalism. Because the ideology of the revolutionaries is a lateral move. That wouldn’t actually make things better. And would see a lot of people needlessly killed.

        The one, possibly best thing we could do. Is for interested, individuals to start pooling their money to buy land. Then build high density, communal housing and sustainable communities. Dedicated towards proving socialist/small c communist principles. Ideally with people able to help replicate such communities. Where there will be no Lords of any sort. And rent will be the cost of what is needed to maintain housing. Not someone’s luxury. The funds to get started would be the biggest hurdle. But once people see there’s nothing to actually fear. And for younger generations, lots to gain. You’d see a lot of people warm up to the idea.

    • Kedly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Just hexbear did the trick for me, although I also dont shy away from blocking users if I find nothing of value coming from their comments.

    • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      They will still be able to influence votes, I believe. Defederation is the only way to prevent that.

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s just as bad on Lemmy.world.

      Got people here literally rooting for the Houthis and Hamas, which are both part of nearly identical, extreme, right wing authoritarian ideologies.

  • Daxtron2@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I notice there is definitely a lot of bad faith discussions happening, but there’s also a lot of us who are autistic lol

  • Fudoshin ️🏳️‍🌈@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s not a Lemmy thing, it’s an internet thing. People have become lazy and instead of discussing things will just vote and move on.

    Makes for a very boring and stale world.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Agreed. I voted as soon as I saw the spelling mistake. We don’t applaud a tenor if he can’t clear his throat, as they say.

      • june@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        That depends very heavily on how you engage with lemmy. Lemmy isn’t a monolith and different communities have very different energies. Some are toxic, many are not. My feed is not terribly toxic like many of you all describe.

        • Fudoshin ️🏳️‍🌈@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          If you don’t notice toxicity it means you have a very standard, milquetoast, agreeable personality with absolutely no controversial opinions.

          Which is fine! I’m not knocking you!

          But to give an example how this ruins it for you and everyone: Questions will get posted like “What’s a controversial opinion you have of…”

          The top comment isn’t controversial at all. It’s hated by some big social ‘bogey man’, but it’s not controversial at all.

          I made the mistake of commenting a REAL controversial opinion - most downvoted comment in the entire thread.

          This results in echo chambers and low-effort jokes (because they’re inoffensive). Dissent is buried.

          Some of the funniest shit I’ve ever read is from 4chan (green-texts and memes) cos they’re dripping in irony and sarcasm. They aren’t tying to be nice. 4chan is also the place I’ve had my views challenged the most and I love that!

          I firmly believe (and practice) downvotes only for spam and irrelevant bullshit.

      • DandomRude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Maybe it’s because a lot of Lemmy users came from reddit, where presumably only a minority of those accounts had a lot of karma. Seems somewhat plausible to me, because the inhibition threshold to leave reddit for Lemmy would be higher if you weren’t just a lurker.

    • Blaze@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ve tried an instance without downvotes for a few days, it’s interesting to see views that would otherwise be heavily downvoted

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Whenever I have a broad vague discussion of the world that is subject to significant interpretations and assumptions it creates a lot of friction too. Contraversy is one place where Lemmy’s high response rates work against it.

    To the people doing “capitalism bad” replies I implore you to check out socialist economists. Fleshed out descriptions of socialism and communism usually discuss emulating the successes of industrial capitalism while mitigating the failures. The idea of armed revolutionary communism is largely a mess that only ever worked in rural environments.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Armed revolutionary communism appeals to teenagers and simpletons, that’s why you see it brought up a lot on Lemmy.

    • archomrade [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Fleshed out descriptions of socialism and communism usually discuss emulating the successes of industrial capitalism while mitigating the failures.

      This is true for socialism, but communist economics are traditionally moneyless.

      Socialism is conceptualized as a transitional economic stage, so it makes a lot of sense it would share commonalities with capitalism.

      Armed revolutionary communism is a bit of a misnomer, since it’s a part of that socialist transitional stage towards communism. If memory serves, it has basically only been done in rural/early industrial states.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Currency has always been a metaphor for energy and other resources to help alleviate the incongruities of a barter economy. A moneyless society is just a barter economy even if people’s needs are largely met.

        • archomrade [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          A moneyless society is just a barter economy even if people’s needs are largely met.

          I’m not even sure this is really true, but even if it was it would still be fundamentally different from industrial capitalism.

          • Fedizen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            The point is not that its the same as capitalism, its just there are constraints on social reality as there are on physical resources. Money is a state intervention and one of the results are systems that skim money off the top of it. Its obvious that an effecient theoretical economy would be more efficient without money as it creates a lot of unwanted problems.

            • archomrade [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Can you clarify the intent and meaning of this original statement? Maybe i’ve misunderstood what you’re trying to say:

              To the people doing “capitalism bad” replies I implore you to check out socialist economists. Fleshed out descriptions of socialism and communism usually discuss emulating the successes of industrial capitalism while mitigating the failures