• Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    punish the entire world

    The absolute fucking nerve of these freaks accusing anyone else of causing harm as their guy, for whom they are trying to shame us into voting, actively funds a genocide.

      • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        8 months ago

        Imagine someone putting a piece of paper on your desk, imagine knowing that signing it means that fascists will be handed around that will be used to commit a genocide, killing thousands of innocents. And then imagine signing the paper instead of tearing it up in revulsion, like a sane human being would do. You have to be a literal demon to do something like that.

        Genocide Joe doesn’t belong in the Hague, he belongs in a free Palestine in front of a war crimes and genocide tribunal there. If there were justice in this world he would be hanged.

    • Æsc@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      You don’t think a 2nd Trump administration would fund a genocide? Why? What about Trump says to you, “Oh yeah, this guy would definitely put a stop to the mass-murder of brown people”?

      • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        112
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I think if you tell me “the other guy would fund a genocide” while your guy is funding a genocide, I’m gonna tell you to shut the fuck up.

        Shut the fuck up.

      • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        92
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Oh god oh no Trump might also continue genocide? Wow that would be… Exactly the same… How terrible!

        “Oh yeah, this guy would definitely put a stop to the mass-murder of brown people”?

        Nobody is saying they think he’ll stop it dickhead. Literally nobody in this thread has said that. But “Trump will be genocidal too” is not the defence of your guy that you seem to think it is.

            • Æsc@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I can fathom that’s what they want, but you can’t always get what you want, especially if what you want is neither a Democrat or Republican to win a state-wide election in the United States. Wanting something does not change the reality of the situation.

                • Æsc@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Where did I shame anyone? I’ve been trying to be polite, I haven’t thrown an insult once. I’ve extended more civility than has been granted to me. Though half of it seems to be residual anger at Reddit.

              • Kuori [she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                39
                ·
                8 months ago

                Wanting something does not change the reality of the situation.

                very true! another good example of that: you want us to support genocide joe but the reality of the situation is we never will.

              • Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                20
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                How about standing up to your corrupt government instead of meekly taking part in the farce it has set up to control you?

                Are you that cowardly that revolution isn’t even an option to you?

          • Wakmrow [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            42
            ·
            8 months ago

            What about Biden winning is preferable? Same policies, at least trump is funny. Trump will probably radicalize more liberals too.

      • the_post_of_tom_joad [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        62
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Ever wonder if youll be able to vote for a guy you aren’t positive will fund a genocide?

        Ever get tired of advocating for something so very disrurbing? It must be ennervating, right? You thought Trump would be gone after the last time.

        Ever ask yourself why you ask for so little?

        Is it the pragmatic choice to make yourself so small?

      • CrispyFern [fae/faer, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        55
        ·
        8 months ago

        You’re absolutely right. I hereby refuse to vote Trump because I believe he would fund genocide. Do you pledge to not vote Biden because he funds genocide?

        • Æsc@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Not really.

          If you’re not in a swing state then you could throw your support behind your preferred third-party candidate, or write in the name of literally any person you can think of who would cut off aid to Israel.

          But not voting just says you’re OK with whomever the other voters pick for president. It says you don’t see a meaningful difference between Biden and Trump. And if you honestly don’t, OK, you’re allowed to think that. But in November, unless one of them dies, either Biden is going to win the election, or Trump is. The want to discourage people from voting against them. If you’re not voting you’re neutral so they don’t care as much.

            • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              8 months ago

              From a pragmatic point it would be easier for the propaganda apparatus to explain away a smaller than usual turnout (voters are lazy, etc.) than a larger than usual this party vote.

              Either way they’ll do their best to bury it though.

              • MayoPete [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                That’s why I advocate “undervoting”. Go vote, cast a ballot, but leave the spots with no good options blank. It shows that you aren’t a “lazy” voter, actually voted, and chose the hidden “none of the above” option.

          • axont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I’m not ok with anyone being president because the USA shouldn’t exist and there’s no way of expressing this sentiment through voting for president. The president is an administrator of a death machine directed by capital. There’s no option for me to vote how I truly want nor do I believe calling for specific votes would be an effective route to secure my goal of nullifying the constitution and installing a communist government. Instead of worrying about the particulars of which genocidal fascist gets into office, I’ll instead direct my efforts towards dismantling the USA in its entirety.

        • Æsc@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Regardless of who they vote for, there are only two possible outcomes to the election, unless one of the nominees dies before then. Either Trump will win, or Biden will win. If you want Biden to lose, that only happens if Trump wins.

          • Sickos [they/them, it/its]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            50
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I fail to see how the outcome of an election could affect a nation’s politics in a long-term meaningful way. Why are you so worried about an election? It’s a popularity contest for morons. Go buy a gun and learn to make some real change in the world.

          • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            40
            ·
            8 months ago

            And the way you get votes is by appealing to voters, not by scaremongering about the other candidate. That tactic especially doesn’t work when you platform is the same.

            • Æsc@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              First-past-the-post voting incentivizes voting against the candidate you don’t want to win by voting for the candidate most likely to beat him. So scaremongering about the other candidate is a strategy often used to great effect. Trump used scaremongering against Hillary in 2016. Trump’s using scaremongering against Biden now. George H.W. Bush famously used scaremongering about crime to win.

              Also their platforms are not the same. Trump has Project 2025.

              • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                32
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                often used to great effect.

                And then you go on to cite the 2016 election.
                Are you doing a bit? Do you not recall the pied-piper strategy the Dems tried? You keep referring to “successful” examples, but they’re all republicans lol.

                • Æsc@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I thought you were the one who said the Democratic and Republican platforms are the same. Now you’re noticing that the examples of winning with scaremongering are all Republican wins. Are you doing a bit?

              • Mokey [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                8 months ago

                The fascist are always going to have been scary rhing that make liberals fascism more palletable and swallowable, even if its in someways worse than the big scary republican bs. Lets just fuck off that whole thing completely

          • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            38
            ·
            8 months ago

            If genocide Joe wants to win he has to make a compelling case that he is going to be meaningfully better than Trump on the issues that matters to voters.

            Until now he has been working hard to make the opposite case.

          • NewLeaf@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            Oh man, remember when it wasn’t going to be an issue because trump was going to jail any minute now we totally promise™?

            How many daddy’s of the week have to be wrong before you stop believing he will he held to any account? You really think somehow, jack smith is going to do anything? Best bet is it will be another wet fart like Mueller or whatever the last daddy of the week was.

          • CommunistCuddlefish [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I want Biden to lose.

            I also want Trump yo lose.

            That’s why I’m not voting for either of them.

            If enough voters suddenly developed a conscience and rejected genocide, voted third party, neither genocidal monster would win. But sure, be mad at the people who oppose genocide instead of all the little Nazis who support genocide.

      • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think Trump will fund a genocide. I know Biden is funding a genocide. I also know Trump was funding that same genocide four years ago when he was in office. When he moved the embassy just to appeal to the zionist monsters. Track record proven.

        Also given that a lot of people are finally awakening to the reality experienced by Palestinians we can safely conclude that Obama, Bush, all the rest going back 75 years were funding a genocide. You really think you can shame us into supporting a system that is so demonstrably rotten to the core on some sort of lesser-evilism bullshit? The time to be fed up with this shit was decades ago. But it’s better late than never. That’s a real sentiment of lesser fucking evil.

        • NewLeaf@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ohhhh I’ve got this one!

          “Any vote not for Biden or not voting at all is a vote for trump”

          maybe-later-kiddo maybe-later-honey smuglord

          • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yeah I was hoping they’d respond with that, because the retort is of course “well in that case you can rest easy, because I will not be voting for Trump a lot more than I won’t be voting for Biden, thus giving Biden several votes”

      • MolotovHalfEmpty [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        An assailant is beating your family to death with a bat. But if you stop him, maybe another guy will come along and pick up the bat, and maybe he might be hypothetically stronger, so I guess you better cheer on the guy currently beating your family to death instead.

        There are arguments as to why a Trump admin could also be theoretically better in terms (less competent, more easily swayed, might actually see opposition), but it doesn’t matter. Because if you’re playing hypothetical games at this point about a fucking genocide you’re just trying to excuse the fact you’re fine with it. And if that’s the case, fuck you.

      • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        hypothetical genocide under Trump vs. actual genocide occurring right now under Biden

        The correct answer is C, none of the above. Two bourgeois genocidal freaks are our only options, and you don’t seem to see that as an extremely urgent problem

    • Æsc@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Technically he’s not unopposed, at least not in some states. But no incumbent president has ever done well in the election when he has to campaign in a primary, if he was challenged the most likely outcome would be he’d win the primary but lose the election.

      • DefinitelyNotAPhone [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        ·
        8 months ago

        Incumbent presidents who have to campaign in the primaries generally lose the election because they’re unpopular. That’s why they have to campaign in the first place. The fact that Biden is currently historically unpopular for this point in his term is a sign that maybe he should be getting the LBJ treatment even by liberal standards, but Blue MAGA is going to Blue MAGA and throw the election like it’s 2016 all over again.

        • Æsc@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          But he’s not having to campaign in the primary, and he is winning it. So I guess he is popular enough.

          It’s ironic that people who dislike Biden so much still don’t know Dean Phillips exists.

  • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    We have a lot of fucking liberal ass losers in here. Must be election season.

    Liberals have pulled this “You’d better vote for us because the other guy will literally kill you if they win!” thing since the 60s, they’ve just shifted around the minority group they target with their threats.

    Maybe if liberals wanted a coalition with leftists, they’d try to do more than piss on our heads and say it’s raining. You wanna vote for genocide Joe, that’s your prerogative. But don’t come in here and try to guilt me into voting for your boy who’s out here running guns to a fascist ethnostate, who has done NOTHING to protect those minority groups, who’s still building a wall, who’s still raising the military/ICE budgets, and try to act like you’re some high and mighty, moralistic motherfucker.

    You want blue team to win because you think it’s “harm reduction” to wait 10-15 years to implement whatever terrible thing conservatives want to do today.

    Don’t believe me? How’s that border wall thing going?

    • wopazoo [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Don’t believe me? How’s that border wall thing going?

      In the same vein, liberals always seem to forget that it was Biden, not Trump, who outlawed abortion.

      • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It’s honestly wild how often I’ve seen libs bring up protecting abortion rights as an argument to vote FOR Joe Biden The Guy Who Let Roe V Wade Get Overturned

    • DragonBallZinn [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      8 months ago

      Maybe if liberals wanted a coalition with leftists, they’d try to do more than piss on our heads and say it’s raining.

      Holy shit, this. It would be awesome if we got in a position where we could call liberals’ bluff. They claim they’re progressive like us but whenever its time to do anything they always worry about “what would the republicans think?” as if they’re too worried they’re going to end up in an SJW cringe compilation.

      It reminds me of innuendo studios alt-right playbook. Liberals are too concerned with taking the moral high ground to use these underhanded, but effective tactics the right does against them. In particular, I want to shout out this part of Innuendo Studios called the Cost of doing business. Democrats may not have to agree with us on paper, but if they want money and power, they would have to put up with us. Here’s Innuendo Studios explaining it from the right’s machine.. If it’s possible, I would point this out that alienating progressives costs elections instead of embracing progressives, look at the rising union movement: only a fool would never take advantage of that, and here come the right ready to explain to them to blame Jews.

    • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      8 months ago

      Anyone talking about harm reduction in the context of the Democratic Party needs to get a ban, cause that shit is straight up just fascist apologia at this late date

      Makes about as much sense as some dork from 2012 talking about harm reduction by voting for Ron Paul

    • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      8 months ago

      Speaking of the border wall which party did the person belong to who recently actually proposed ending the asylum program.

    • CommunistCuddlefish [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      As someone in the demographics liberals say Trump will put in death camps:

      Bring it. I’ve been psychologically prepared for this since the War on Terror made it clear that people like me can never be safe in America. I’m not bothered. You know who is? The fucking white liberals who are afraid Trump will take away the privileges they enjoy that normal people like me never had.

      This is all projection on their part. That’s why they’re so upset when we say we won’t be complicit in genocide. They know they can’t admit they’re worried about themselves because it looks bad, so they try to use us minorities as scapegoats for why they support genocide instead – but when you peel back all their rhetoric, it’s obvious that the White Liberal is too self-absorbed to care about anyone other than themself.

    • M68040 [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yeah, that’s the part that sits badly about this whole angle to me. What, I owe a bunch of completely detached motherfuckers success? They sure seem like they’re barely bothering to show up. If I was halfassing my job this bad i’d’ve been fired a year ago.

    • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      He’s not even doing that, he’s being actively terrible. But we’re told we have to vote for him because the other guy is going to be MORE terrible.

      Maybe if libs want us to vote for him, he should try and not do terrible things? Just a thought.

  • WhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t think Biden being a pragmatic choice is a settled matter. I haven’t seen anything that implies he is a meaningful distinction on things I care about.

    Israel? Nope

    Student debt? Nope

    Abortion? Nope

    Unions? Nope

    Climate change? Nope

    The border? Nope

    Homelessness? Nope

    War on drugs? Nope

    Inflation? Nope

    Tax lobbying? Nope

    Healthcare? Nope

    LGBT protection? Maybe if you squint your eyes

    Campaign finance? Nope

    Difference between productivity and purchasing power? Nope

    Copyright? Nope

    Breaking up big business monopolies? Nope

    Oh yeah…

    And…

    WAR??? FUCKING NO

    The worst most hawkish fascist military might that has ever existed and continues to constrict the entire planet? Nope

    The only difference is whether fascists get radicalized or they get emboldened

      • beef_curds [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        8 months ago

        They weren’t even saving the issue to cynically run on in 2024, which would be an obvious way to get votes.

        Turns out he’s just a shitbag who agrees with the decision on some level, so he won’t even campaign on it without mincing words.

        What a fucking joke. I just can’t hear libs complain about how important this election is when the man himself is throwing.

      • ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        8 months ago

        Thank you I feel like I’m the only one in the country willing to blame him for that. I don’t understand why people solely blame Trump and the republicans for a decision that happened under Biden. Yes Trump set the stage for it, but Biden was the one that let it happen.

  • Skeleton_Erisma [they/them, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    >didn't get exactly what you wanted

    And this right here is actually the crux of the issue showing itself in full force.

    You ever wonder why shit gets sandbagged?

    These smug liberals genuinely see our hardships and concerns but draws the conclusion “oh well good golly gee willickers! I guess they just love to throw tantrums”.

    There’s nothing more I can say except pit.

  • CTHlurker [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    8 months ago

    After reading through the list of liberal complaints about what a unique and scary thing a 2nd Trump term would be, in particular with regards to the Project 2025, I’m beginning to wonder why Libs don’t ever make demands of their party. Like, if Trump plans on sacking a whole bunch of civil-servants because they are perceived as disloyal to him/the GOP, then you already know what the gameplan for the Right is going to be, so just begin making your own preparations. Begin making your own database of freaks whom the GOP has put into power for being loyal foot-soldiers to the party and the second you get back into any sort of room that with decisionmaking power, begin ruthlessly purging them. Not like Biden is even against the concept of a purge, judging by how his team of bat-shit Neocons are currently running Ukraine.

    • NewLeaf@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Last election cycle, I got flamed by libs for suggesting that incoming administrations like Biden don’t seem to have plans for implementing their ideas. They say something like “Biden is going to cancel student debt” then when I ask what the steps to do that would be, I just get NPC “neutral, neutral, neutral, mad” comic face. I then ask "there isn’t even a folder laying around the Biden campaign office that has plans in it?

      Apparently I’m a big, stupid asshole for asking stuff like that.

  • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    8 months ago

    “not getting exactly what you wanted”, like i’m gonna have to eat chocolate ice cream with hershey’s kisses in it instead of milka drops…

    but in reality it’s oops genocide

  • ZWQbpkzl [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    8 months ago

    These people simply dont see Biden as a sponsor of genocide. There’s no point in arguing with someone over whether or not to vote for Biden if you both can’t agree on that fact.

      • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is the ultimate sticking point for me.

        Biden does not need ro be doing a genocide, it isn’t propping up support for him.

        If they didn’t want to do a genocide they could stop and increase support.

        If they wanted to increase support they could stop doing a genocide.

        But they don’t, because continuing rhe genocide is, obviously from observable reality, more impirtant to them than easily beating those fascists they want you to he so concerned about.

        If Biden announced today he was stopping aid to Isreal he’d win the election by 20 points.

        But instead he won’t and they’ll just spend more time and energy blaming us.

  • ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    8 months ago

    he is the nominee, through the usual process.

    Oh yeah the usual process where we have a primary election to decide the nominee. I sure am glad there’s a primary I get to vote in to decide the nominee.

    Oh wait, my state didn’t even have a primary! So no dipshit, he didn’t become the nominee by the usual process, he became the nominee by being entirely unopposed.

    • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is my favorite part of the argument.

      “You can voice your disapproval in thenorimaries but we have to all agree to come together and support whoever the nominee is”

      shamelessly rat fucks every other nominee at every turn and repeatedly takes away your ability to even theoretically voice that disaproval

      “Why is everybody unhappy with our candidate”

      If your boss told you they had to fire you because you were late for work you would be reasonably upset if you had caught him slashing your tires that morning.