• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    171
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    All she has to do is say she’ll show up to talk to the American people even if Trump doesn’t feel it’s important or if he can’t handle a debate.

    Maybe even say it’s understandable given his age and general health threat he can’t handle it again.

    And trump will 100% show up and make an even bigger ass of himself.

    It’s against instinct, but that’s how you fuck with people like trump

    • niktemadur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Man oh man, do I hope the Harris campaign embraces this trolling-the-troll tactic, and that it makes an impact with enough of the bOtH pArTiEs ArE tHe SaMe LoL aMiRiTe dumb-as-a-rock crowd.

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    153
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I wish it mattered. I wish facts and functional debate mattered more than racism, bigotry, and fear of others. People who vote for him do so not because of his ability in discourse.

    • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      FUCK YOUR FEELINGS Commie! But Kamala Harris hurt my feelings so she’s BAD and I’m NOT Voting for her!

    • niktemadur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      I wish politics didn’t get reduced to “he/she was good on the teevee” level or below that.

      In 2016, I remember Hillary being perfectly rational and clear during the debates. Yet I also remember reaction photos from across the country, people not even listening to the words being spoken, just squirming at the sight of Clinton, poisoned by decades of negative propaganda against her, utterly oblivious just how viscerally they had been manipulated by right-wing media’s hatred towards “this… this… uppity librul woman”.

      They didn’t listen to a single goddamned word being spoken by anyone. They might as well been watching a silent .gif as far as they were concerned. Such informed voters, so savvy! bOtH pArTiEs ArE tHe SaMe!

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 months ago

        And Harris seems to know how dimwitted those viewers are, hence the vibe check campaign. You don’t need to comprehend words to see Trump squirm and her laughing it off. I hope that plan works!

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        “Is it possible that we just had a bad candidate…? No, it’s the voters who are wrong!”

        • Bobmighty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          The voters were right actually. Trump lost the popular vote by a decent chunk. It’s our fucked up, right biased electoral college that put him in the White House. Hillary won the voters.

          • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Shhh, don’t tell them there is a lot of slant to their side, it would shatter their victim complex

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The people who vote for him don’t read, they barely understand segments on TV - they understand the big picture from sound bites and short videos. The debates just broke Trump into the worst possible clips imaginable and will definitely trickle into the feeds of some ardent followers who will question why their man looked stupid when usually he looks so smart. It will show the deplorables their leader IS that dumb.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Until last night, I thought sometimes Trump was being maybe 1% strategic by behaving like one of these goofballs that votes for him. After watching him debate with the moderators using “I SAW IT ON TV” as an argument, I think he is one of them.

        • Mountain_Mike_420@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Trump famously watched a lot of Fox News while in the white house. I think in the logs it was called “private time” or something.

  • SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    More specifically: he is furious that he was humiliated by a woman.

    Because humiliating women is part of his imminent being, thus his status quo has been challenged, and he fuckin’ hates that someone beneath him doesn’t “know their place.”

    Hope she wins.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    She established control with the forced handshake and introducing herself. Which I don’t think she planned, but she saw the opportunity and jumped all over it. I almost expected him to turn away and run off, it rattled him.

    • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      97
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I believe that was 100% planned, she knew perfectly well going in he wouldn’t meet her in the middle and instead asserted the situation. He didn’t shake hands with Clinton or Biden - I thought it was a great way to show him she’s different.

    • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean at this point he probably has a phobia of adept legal professionals. She probably gave him the Prosecution stare and he damn near wet himself.

      • Wiz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        He wasn’t prepared for it. It was /her/ handshake.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      How do you think they chose to have her introduce herself by name?

      Saw speculation it was due to mispronunciation

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    She should take the opportunity to debate an empty podium. (Mostly kidding, because when Eastwood “debated” an empty chair, he just seemed senile and silly.)

    But I do think the country needs to see Tim Walz give a good schooling to JD Vance.

    • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Trump wasn’t going to say anything coherent anyway. Just stick Alec Baldwin up there and have him read AI generated nonsense.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think the country seeing more of those two would really sway votes the way I’d prefer. So I’m biased.

      But gov Walz represents as very genuine and honest and caring, and the more we can see some of that on our TVs the more we can believe that a most-good-soonest kind of administration is an option.

      Look. They could lose. Or Harris and Walz could be faking, even if I don’t think so (or want to think so). Or gopnik fearmongering could be right and they could only be barely better than a Dump/Chance ticket.

      Just give us this. We haven’t had positivity and hope since prez Obama and the hope of Change[TM].

      Now, as I haven’t suggested everyone boycott for one particular single issue or another, I expect downvotes right to hell. So be it.

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I think the country seeing more of those two would really sway votes the way I’d prefer. So I’m biased.

        It won’t change a single vote.

        It will only change the way they say they voted.

        It’s just like 2016 before the election, everyone is a devout libertarian, sticking by their principles.

        Speaking of voter fraud, did you know nobody voted for Bush in 2004? Everyone you ask says they didn’t now, weird huh?

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      She should take the opportunity to debate an empty podium. (Mostly kidding, because when Eastwood “debated” an empty chair, he just seemed senile and silly.)

      A whole debate with that would be silly. She could turn it into a town hall style discussion and run commercials with her debating and “waiting” on donald. He could be scared somewhere with a blankie.

      Look at the debate from the start. His slow ass could barely make it to his podium before she was their to shake his hand. She was fast, confident, and looked strong to me. Donald looked like he was huffing to the stage.

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hopefully this is the election that ends Trump’s political career once and for all. Guy just needs to fuck off for good.

    • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 months ago

      The interviews with independents worry me. The Times was saying they complained about not getting enough specifics from Harris.

      Which is infurating being how handwavy Trump’s whole platform is. For example, I have no idea how he intends to get sub $2 gas being the last time it happened the price of crude was literally negative.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        2 months ago

        Some independent voters are just Republicans that are ashamed to admit it. You are not persuading them.

        For movable independents, Harris spoke of infinitely more policy specifics because Trump had zippo the entire night.

        • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          All libertarians are just republicans minus the religion who probably smoke week. They’ll vote red all the live long day but will go full “Well Ackchyually” so they can easily dismiss when the guy they voted for does something truthfully awful

          • 800XL@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 months ago

            Libertarians are just people who think they shouldn’t have to pay taxes believe they deserve everything taxes pay for by virtue of their inflated self-worth

            • Wiz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Honest question: Do you vote? And which party must aligns most with your values?

              I would think it would be difficult for you in the mostly binary first-past-the-post political world we have.

              • webadict@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                If I had to guess, the party that wants to convert the US to an authoritarian dictatorship through Project 2025 probably is less represented by an absolution of heirachical structures than the party that wants a maintaining of status quo. Not that they both don’t represent their own forms of heirarchical structures, but one is significantly harder to remove than the other.

    • pedz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      2 months ago

      Don’t be so sure. It may not be Trump but wanna bet that Elon Musk will run for president with the same kind of BS?

      • tektite@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Why do people keep saying this? Leon was born in South Africa. So unless Trump wins and fucks everything, the muskrat cannot be president.

        • pedz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m not American and did not realize this. That’s very good news. Thanks for pointing it out.

          • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            The only people that were able to be president and not born a US citizen, were the founding fathers. Basically you have to be born on US territory to be eligible. The Republicans tried to charge that so they could run Schwarzenegger but it didn’t get very far and probably won’t be tried again for a generation.

            But that’s not going to stop a naturally born American citizen sock puppet of Musky from trying to run as a candidate

    • bignate31@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      uhhh… Is that “confirmed”? Seems to say “Trump still won’t commit” which is substantially different from “Trump won’t do it”

        • Syrc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Where? In the article I see

          “Are we going to do a rematch? I just don’t know,” he told reporters Wednesday afternoon. “We’ll think about it.”

          His comments suggest he is not altogether serious about a sequel. In a morning phone call to the co-hosts of “Fox & Friends,” he said, “when you win the debate, I don’t, I don’t know that I want to do another debate.”

          “I wouldn’t want to have Bret and Martha,” he said, before proposing Sean Hannity, Jesse Watters or Laura Ingraham instead.

          Trump told reporters Wednesday afternoon that he would theoretically show up for a debate hosted by either NBC or Fox, but first “we have to determine whether or not we even want to do it.”

          “Obviously, he likes these debates and he’s good at them, so I wouldn’t be surprised if he wants to step back in the ring, but I also wouldn’t be surprised if he doesn’t. It’s his choice,” Vance told Fox News.

          Which definitely shows insecurity, but nothing definite (unfortunately).

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    2 months ago

    Conventional knowledge is that it’s in Harris’s advantage to not give him another chance, even though she’d probably trounce him. He’s mostly just afraid of her after being bullied back effectively for the first time on stage.

    I cried laughing when he took the rally size bait. It’s a shame we won’t get more of that, lol

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      I cried laughing when he took the rally size bait. It’s a shame we won’t get more of that, lol

      I don’t watch american debates. What was the bait?

      • immutable@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        2 months ago

        She invited the American public to watch one of his weird rallies and watch how his small crowds leave early due to exhaustion and boredom.

        He could not help himself and refused to answer the next debate question spending all of his time talking about how big his rallies were, how Harris’ rallies were small and fake.

        He ended it with, and I have to preface this with the fact that this is a real thing that happened and not hyperbole I’m using for comedic effect, talking about some unhinged and completely baseless conspiracy about immigrants stealing and eating peoples pets.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            If I had the chance to call myself in 2016, I don’t think my past self would believe half the shit I’d say.

            • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Dasus: Hey future me. So, how did Hillary’s first and second terms in office go?

              Future Dasus: Yeah… about that.

              Dasus: No. Oh no. Dammit. There are that many stupid people voting that trash into office? Man, where is a good old fashioned plague when you need one? /s

              Future Dasus: You’re not gonna believe this…

        • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          talking about some unhinged and completely baseless conspiracy about immigrants stealing and eating peoples pets.

          The fact that he was so easily riled up and went immediately off script with such wild baseless improv, only to get fact-checked by the moderator, was glorious to watch. His handlers advisors must have broken the sound barrier face-palming through that.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Remember that time Trump did so horribly in the debate then wandered out into the press room after to make sure everybody thought he did well?

    • Kalysta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      He looked more like someone with Sundowner’s who got away from his nurses.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not that I don’t believe this - Snell is a laywer and commentator seen on MSNBC and NPR - but I would like to see more than a screenshot of a tweet about it.

  • thefartographer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Time to start calling in to any news outlet at the same time that Trump’s on the air to debate him over the phone.

    Then create social media bots to reply to each of Trump’s posts with “Why is this weird old guy too scared to debate me?”

    Bully him out of his own safe spaces and see what happens when he has nowhere to hide.

  • nieminen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Worth noting, that the person who feels like they won the debate won’t want more because it can only hurt them. He probably thinks he won.

    • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      It could be either; he thinks he won or he knows he lost and has no hope of improving.

      Fwiw I think the few undecideds that are left probably saw what they needed to make their decision last night.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      The behaviour is also consistent with someone who knows they lost and expects to lose hard again if there’s a rematch. Maybe even more so if he had the impression he was holding his own while it was going and then saw what everyone else was saying after the fact.

      • nieminen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I guess there’s always rational for either way being true, it’s all speculation anyway 😂

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh man I am looking forward to JD Vance asking everyone how long they’ve been working there.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        Trump can read a room and change his positions accordingly; he knows banning abortion is unpopular, so he frames it as “Well actually I’m why all those states had referendum’s protecting women’s healthcare”, which is is true, in the same way Rosa Park’s bus driver played a role in the Montgomery Bus Boycott.

        JD Vance does not have such instincts.